Human identification via digital palatal scans: a machine learning validation pilot study

• Main Authors: Ákos Mikolicz (Author), Botond Simon (Author), Aida Roudgari (Author), Arvin Shahbazi (Author), János Vág (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: BMC, 2024-11-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/s12903-024-05162-0; 1472-6831
• Keywords: Geometry; Palate; Machine learning; Intraoral scanner; Sex; Human identification; Dentistry; RK1-715
• Source: BMC Oral Health, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2024)

Abstract Background This study aims to validate a machine learning algorithm previously developed in a training population on a different randomly chosen population (i.e., test set). The discrimination potential of the palatal intraoral scan-based geometric and superimposition methods was evaluated. Methods A total of 23 participants (16 females and seven males) from different countries underwent palatal scans using the Emerald intraoral scanner. Geometric-based identification involved measuring the height, width, and depth of the palatal vault in each scan. These parameters were then input into Fisher's linear discriminant equations with coefficients determined previously on a training set. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. For the superimposition method, scan repeatability was compared to between-subjects differences, calculating mean absolute differences (MAD) between aligned scans. Multiple linear regression analysis determined the effects of sex, longitude, and latitude of country of origin on concordance. Results The geometric-based method achieved 91.2% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity, consistent with the results from the training set, showing no significant difference. Latitude and longitude did not significantly affect geometric-based matches. In the superimposition method, the between-subjects MAD range (1.068-0.214 mm) and the repeatability range (0.011-0.093 mm) did not overlap. MAD was minimally affected by longitude and not influenced by latitude. The sex determination function recognized females over males with 69.0% sensitivity, similar to the training set. However, the specificity (62.5%) decreased. Conclusions The assessment of geometric and superimposition discrimination has unequivocally demonstrated its robust reliability, remaining impervious to population. In contrast, the distinction between sexes carries only moderate reliability. The significant correlation observed among longitude, latitude, and palatal height suggests the feasibility of a comprehensive large-scale study to determine one's country of origin. Clinical significance Portable intraoral scanners can aid forensic investigations as adjunct identification methods by applying the proposed discriminant function to palatal geometry without population restrictions. Trial registration The Clinicatrial.gov registration number is NCT05349942 (27/04/2022).