Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network

Abstract Objective The rapid development of artificial intelligence technologies for medical imaging has recently enabled automatic identification of anatomical landmarks on radiographs. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of an automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sangmin Jeon (Author), Kyungmin Clara Lee (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9ab9d05bf1bd410f9d3536d73fa9d0d7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sangmin Jeon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kyungmin Clara Lee  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s40510-021-00358-4 
500 |a 2196-1042 
520 |a Abstract Objective The rapid development of artificial intelligence technologies for medical imaging has recently enabled automatic identification of anatomical landmarks on radiographs. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of an automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network with those obtained by a conventional cephalometric approach. Material and methods Cephalometric measurements of lateral cephalograms from 35 patients were obtained using an automatic program and a conventional program. Fifteen skeletal cephalometric measurements, nine dental cephalometric measurements, and two soft tissue cephalometric measurements obtained by the two methods were compared using paired t test and Bland-Altman plots. Results A comparison between the measurements from the automatic and conventional cephalometric analyses in terms of the paired t test confirmed that the saddle angle, linear measurements of maxillary incisor to NA line, and mandibular incisor to NB line showed statistically significant differences. All measurements were within the limits of agreement based on the Bland-Altman plots. The widths of limits of agreement were wider in dental measurements than those in the skeletal measurements. Conclusions Automatic cephalometric analyses based on convolutional neural network may offer clinically acceptable diagnostic performance. Careful consideration and additional manual adjustment are needed for dental measurements regarding tooth structures for higher accuracy and better performance. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cephalometric analysis 
690 |a Artificial intelligence 
690 |a Machine learning 
690 |a Convolutional neural network 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Progress in Orthodontics, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00358-4 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2196-1042 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9ab9d05bf1bd410f9d3536d73fa9d0d7  |z Connect to this object online.