Effect of surface treatment and storage on the bond strength of different ceramic systems

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro shear bond strength of different ceramic systems - IPS Empress 2, Cergogold, In-Ceram Alumina and Cercon - and a dual luting agent. Methods: Twelve specimens of each ceramic were fabricated and divided according different surface treatments: Group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernando Carlos Hueb de Menezes (Author), Gilberto Antônio Borges (Author), Thiago Assunção Valentino (Author), Maria Angélica Hueb de Menezes Oliveira (Author), Cecília Pedroso Turssi (Author), Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2015-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9ba66f9906c742bd9dd1ef1cfbe4381a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Fernando Carlos Hueb de Menezes  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gilberto Antônio Borges  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Thiago Assunção Valentino  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maria Angélica Hueb de Menezes Oliveira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cecília Pedroso Turssi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effect of surface treatment and storage on the bond strength of different ceramic systems 
260 |b Universidade Estadual de Campinas,   |c 2015-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.20396/bjos.v8i3.8642125 
500 |a 1677-3225 
520 |a Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro shear bond strength of different ceramic systems - IPS Empress 2, Cergogold, In-Ceram Alumina and Cercon - and a dual luting agent. Methods: Twelve specimens of each ceramic were fabricated and divided according different surface treatments: Group 1: No additional treatment was applied to the ceramic surface; Group 2: Ceramics were etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid; Group 3: specimens treated with airborne particle abrasion for each ceramic system in accordance with manufacturer's instructions (n=20). The tests were performed after 24 h or after water storage for 6 months. Data were then assessed statistically using the 3-way ANOVA and the Tukey's test (P<0.05). Results: For Cergogold and IPS Empress 2 systems, the treatments performed with airborne particle abrasion and hydrofluoric acid showed no significant differences from each other, and both were superior to the groups without treatment. For Cercon and In-Ceram ceramics, no differences were found among the groups (P<0.05). When the surface was treated with hydrofluoric acid, the highest bond strength was found to IPS Empress 2 in the 6-month storage period (P<0.05). Conclusion: Lower bond strength values were only observed with IPS Empress 2 ceramic for the control group in the 6-month storage (P<0.05). 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Ceramics 
690 |a Cementation 
690 |a Surface treatment 
690 |a Micro shear 
690 |a Bond strength 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, Vol 8, Iss 3 (2015) 
787 0 |n https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642125 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1677-3225 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9ba66f9906c742bd9dd1ef1cfbe4381a  |z Connect to this object online.