Using a fingerstick test for haematological monitoring in patients treated with clozapine

Background Treatment with clozapine requires regular blood monitoring in order to minimise the risk of agranulocytosis. The demands on patients and clinicians associated with monitoring may be reduced by using point-of-care, as opposed to lab-based assessments. We assessed the utility of a device th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew Atkins (Author), Philip McGuire (Author), Bhirundra Balgobin (Author), Pravinkumar Patel (Author), David Taylor (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9c766a60c32e4ff3b6f68d49ac6bf294
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Matthew Atkins  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Philip McGuire  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bhirundra Balgobin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pravinkumar Patel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a David Taylor  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Using a fingerstick test for haematological monitoring in patients treated with clozapine 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2045-1261 
500 |a 10.1177/20451253211000865 
520 |a Background Treatment with clozapine requires regular blood monitoring in order to minimise the risk of agranulocytosis. The demands on patients and clinicians associated with monitoring may be reduced by using point-of-care, as opposed to lab-based assessments. We assessed the utility of a device that can measure white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts by capillary fingerstick blood. Method The performance of a small, portable device (HemoCue® WBC DIFF System) was compared with that of a widely used laboratory analyser (ADVIA® 2120i) for measuring WBC and neutrophil counts. Patients with schizophrenia who were being treated with clozapine ( n  = 201) provided a fingerstick capillary sample and a venous sample for the respective assays. Results WBC counts and neutrophil counts from venous blood as determined by ADVIA 2120i, ranged from 3.0 × 10 9 /l to 19.5 × 10 9 /l, and 1.2 × 10 9 /l to 15.9 × 10 9 /l, respectively. There was a strong correlation between the results from venous and the capillary sample methods (WBC: R  = 0.89, neutrophil: R  = 0.92). By Passing-Bablok regression analysis, the slope of the association between ADVIA ® 2120i and HemoCue WBC DIFF for WBC was 1.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.944-1.086], with intercept at −0.9 (95% CI −1.43 to −0.45). For neutrophils, the slope was 0.870 (95% CI 0.817-0.923), with intercept at −0.19 (95% CI −0.43 to 0.02). Overall, mean biases of −0.95 × 10 9 /l for WBC, and −0.91 × 10 9 /l for neutrophils were observed for the capillary blood method compared with the venous blood method. Below the clinical cutoff intervals for clozapine monitoring WBC (<3.5 × 10 9 /l) and neutrophils (<1.5 × 10 9 /l) these biases were −1.1 × 10 9 /l for WBC, and −0.25 × 10 9 /l for neutrophils. Conclusion Results from the capillary blood HemoCue WBC DIFF analyser compared well with the venous blood ADVIA 2120i analyser for determining WBC and neutrophil counts. There was a slight overall bias, with the capillary method reporting lower values for both measures. Fingerstick point-of-care analysis is suitable for monitoring blood counts in patients on clozapine, although confirmatory standard venous testing is recommended for test results falling below accepted thresholds. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
690 |a Psychiatry 
690 |a RC435-571 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology, Vol 11 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253211000865 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2045-1261 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9c766a60c32e4ff3b6f68d49ac6bf294  |z Connect to this object online.