Gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with the use of intravenous oliceridine compared with intravenous hydromorphone or fentanyl in acute pain management utilizing adjusted indirect treatment comparison methods
Background: In the absence of head-to-head comparative data from randomized controlled trials, indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) may be used to compare the relative effects of treatments versus a common comparator (either placebo or active treatment). For acute pain management, the effects of ol...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Joseph Biskupiak (Author), Gary Oderda (Author), Diana Brixner (Author), Todd L Wandstrat (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Becaris Publishing Limited,
2024-03-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
High-dose intravenous hydromorphone for patients who use opioids in the hospital setting: time to reduce the barriers
by: Laura E. Labonté, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Intravenous vs Intrathecal fentanyl in prevention of intraoperative shivering
by: Muralidhara D Patel, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Comparison of the analgesic effect of intravenous paracetamol/midazolam and fentanyl in preparation
by: Abbasali Ahmadi, et al.
Published: (2015) -
The effect of ampule size of fentanyl on perioperative intravenous opioid dosing
by: David M Rosenfeld, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Safety and efficacy of intravenous hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine in acute pancreatitis: An open-label, randomized controlled trial
by: Zhiyao Chen, et al.
Published: (2022)