Comparison between Mycophenolate Mofetil and Azathioprine for Preventing Renal Relapse in Lupus Nephritis: An Evidence-based Case Report

Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease which involved many organs. One of its severe manifestations is lupus nephritis (LN). Treatment of LN consists of two phases, induction and maintenance. Inappropriate treatment approach could increase morbidity and mortality in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bambang Setiyohadi (Author), Muhammad Aji Muharrom (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Indonesia Rheumatology Association, 2018-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9d07e5f57a0e4e6fbcd70a8af6980e59
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bambang Setiyohadi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Muhammad Aji Muharrom  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison between Mycophenolate Mofetil and Azathioprine for Preventing Renal Relapse in Lupus Nephritis: An Evidence-based Case Report 
260 |b Indonesia Rheumatology Association,   |c 2018-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2086-1435 
500 |a 2581-1142 
500 |a 10.37275/ijr.v10i2.140 
520 |a Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease which involved many organs. One of its severe manifestations is lupus nephritis (LN). Treatment of LN consists of two phases, induction and maintenance. Inappropriate treatment approach could increase morbidity and mortality in LN patients. Renal flare is among many bad outcomes of LN that should be mitigated with an appropriate therapeutic approach. Various guidelines stated usage of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA) as an appropriate immunosuppresant in the maintenance phase. However, it is not clear which agent acts best in preventing renal flare. This paper presents a case of 21 years old SLE female patient with history of renal flare 1 month prior to admission. This study aimed to give evidence-based recommendation to adjust this patient’s therapy in order to prevent future renal flare episode. Method: Literature search was done on four online databases, namely PubMed, EBSCO, Cohrane Library, and ProQuest. Articles with randomized clinical trial (RCT), systematic review and meta-analysis study design were retrieved and selected based on inclusion and exclusion criterias. Critical appraisal was done using appraisal sheet provided by Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine. Articles were appraised based on its validity, importance, and applicability. Results: There were 144 articles retrieved from literature searching. Further screening and full-text reading yields to 2 RCTs and 2 meta-analysis that were critically appraised. Both meta-analysis were satisfactory on their validity, while none of RCTs found were blinded studies. Both meta-analyses showed pooled risk ratio (RR) of 0.70 (0.49 â€" 1.00) for renal flare outcome in the use of mycophenolate mofetil compared to azathioprine. Conclusion There are no significant differences between mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in prevention of renal flare. Based on applicability, azathioprine is more appropriate to be given in this patient, in accordance to her background. Keywords : Lupus Nephritis, Renal Flare, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Azathioprine, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Indonesian Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 10, Iss 2 (2018) 
787 0 |n https://journalrheumatology.or.id/index.php/ijr/article/view/140 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2086-1435 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2581-1142 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9d07e5f57a0e4e6fbcd70a8af6980e59  |z Connect to this object online.