Allergic rhinitis self-care advice in community pharmacies: A simulated patient study

Background: Pharmacists and pharmacy assistants can support consumers by identifying minor ailments and providing evidence-based advice about treatment options. In the Netherlands, advice is based on national minor ailment guidelines and structured WWHAM questions (Who, What, How long, Action, Medic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rian Lelie - van der Zande (Author), Ellen S. Koster (Author), Martina Teichert (Author), Marcel L. Bouvy (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9d5d76d3af4d4938b72ad9f45ddf43b8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rian Lelie - van der Zande  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ellen S. Koster  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Martina Teichert  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marcel L. Bouvy  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Allergic rhinitis self-care advice in community pharmacies: A simulated patient study 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2667-2766 
500 |a 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100086 
520 |a Background: Pharmacists and pharmacy assistants can support consumers by identifying minor ailments and providing evidence-based advice about treatment options. In the Netherlands, advice is based on national minor ailment guidelines and structured WWHAM questions (Who, What, How long, Action, Medication). Objectives: To study whether pharmacy assistants provide guideline-compliant advice for allergic rhinitis based on WWHAM and condition-specific questions (When and Familiarity) and their association with appropriate self-care advice. Methods: A retrospective study of the assessments of simulated patient (SP) visits regarding one condition- and two symptom-based cases of allergic rhinitis in Dutch community pharmacies. Pharmacies that participated in 2014, 2016 and 2018 were selected. SPs documented their observations of the problem analysis, dispensing and client interaction on a standardized scoresheet. Dispensing of an oral antihistamine according to the guideline recommendation was considered as the correct outcome. Chi-square tests were used to analyze differences in scores for problem analysis of pharmacies with correct and incorrect advice provision in 2014 and 2018. Predictors for correct outcome were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Data from 673 pharmacies were available for all three years. In 2014 and 2018, problems were presented as a symptom (running nose), and 41.2% and 21.1% of pharmacies dispensed an antihistamine. For the condition-based problem (allergy) in 2016, 96.0% of participating pharmacies dispensed an antihistamine. Both in 2014 and 2018, each additional problem analysis question increased the odds ratio of providing correct advice. Questions asked about 'hay fever symptoms', 'medication', 'when symptoms occurred', and 'familiar symptoms' were significant predictors of correct advice provision. Conclusions: Most pharmacies provided appropriate advice for a condition-based request but less than half of them provided appropriate advice for a symptom-based request. More questions asked was associated with an increased chance of providing correct advice. Addition of condition-specific questions may improve the WWHAM-method. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Allergic rhinitis 
690 |a Mystery shopping 
690 |a Patient simulation 
690 |a Pharmacy assistant 
690 |a Self-care 
690 |a Simulated patient 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, Vol 4, Iss , Pp 100086- (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727662100086X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2667-2766 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9d5d76d3af4d4938b72ad9f45ddf43b8  |z Connect to this object online.