In vitro evaluation of the clinical utility of Apitolisib/Vorinostat combination in Apitolisib-resistant H1975 lung adenocarcinoma cells

Abstract Background The PI3K signalling pathway regulates the metabolic activity of cells. Disruption by PI3K inhibitors causes an aerobic/anaerobic imbalance that decreases energy production and cell growth. Cancer cells adapt to PI3K inhibitors in order to reduce their effectiveness. Resistance to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abduladim Hmmier (Author), Paul Dowling (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9e4cd27a9c7d4f3aa45a2f3d06206ab1
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Abduladim Hmmier  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Paul Dowling  |e author 
245 0 0 |a In vitro evaluation of the clinical utility of Apitolisib/Vorinostat combination in Apitolisib-resistant H1975 lung adenocarcinoma cells 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s43094-024-00712-3 
500 |a 2314-7253 
520 |a Abstract Background The PI3K signalling pathway regulates the metabolic activity of cells. Disruption by PI3K inhibitors causes an aerobic/anaerobic imbalance that decreases energy production and cell growth. Cancer cells adapt to PI3K inhibitors in order to reduce their effectiveness. Resistance to Apitolisib could be due to intrinsic factors or acquired adaptation. Oncologists often ask whether to discontinue Apitolisib, increase its dose, or use a drug combination. Methods We observed the proliferation of resistant cells in (H1975R+) and out (H1975R−) of Apitolisib treatment, cell cycle pattern, energy phenotyping/reprogramming, and the effects of combining Apitolisib with Vorinostat on the acquired proliferation of H1975R− cells. Results The Proliferation of H1975R− cells increased, while that of H1975R+ cells remained suppressed. Both conditions showed a 5 × decrease in the number of cells at the Go/G1 phase and doubled at S and G2/M phases (p < 0.0001). Both H1975R− and H1975R+ cells exhibited decreased ECAR, with a stronger effect observed in H1975R+ cells (p < 0.0001). Oxygen consumption (OCR) increased significantly in H1975R− compared with that in H1975P (p = 0.02). The resistant cells became energetically active using mitochondrial respiration in drug-free medium; H1975R+ was hypo-energetic and consumed more free fatty acids (p = 0.0001). Ketone bodies in H1975R+ were increased by 40% and 2 × in BOHB and AcAc levels, respectively, compared to that in H1975P and H1975R− (p < 0.0001). H1975R− cell survival was 80% compared with 20% in H975R+ cells treated with 7 μM Vorinostat. Vorinostat effectively controlled acquired hyperproliferation of H1975R− cells. Conclusion If a tumour becomes unresponsive to Apitolisib, it is advisable to continue the inhibitor and consider a combination with non-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a H1975 lung adenocarcinoma 
690 |a Apitolisib-acquired resistance 
690 |a Acquired aggressive proliferation 
690 |a Metabolic reprogramming 
690 |a Apitolisib/Vorinostat combination 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-024-00712-3 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2314-7253 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9e4cd27a9c7d4f3aa45a2f3d06206ab1  |z Connect to this object online.