Efficacy of laser therapy for temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of laser therapy in temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in regard to this issue were searched in electronic databases. Three investigators independently screened the eligible studies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yan Zhang (Author), Yingqiu Qian (Author), Kangxin Huo (Author), Jingxin Liu (Author), Xi Huang (Author), Jie Bao (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9e9aa5f23c8d411d8f815f4c8e21d7dd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Yan Zhang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yingqiu Qian  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kangxin Huo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jingxin Liu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Xi Huang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jie Bao  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Efficacy of laser therapy for temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0965-2299 
500 |a 10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102945 
520 |a Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of laser therapy in temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in regard to this issue were searched in electronic databases. Three investigators independently screened the eligible studies, and the quality of the included studies was assessed according to the risk of bias tool recommended by the Cochrane handbook. The primary outcome measure was the degree of pain, reported on a visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcome measures were TMJ function, including maximum active vertical opening (MAVO), maximum passive vertical opening (MPVO), left and right lateral movement (LLE, RLE). Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random effects models and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: A total of 28 randomized controlled trials were included. Laser therapy had a more significant effect in terms of VAS (SMD=﹣1.88; 95% CI=﹣2.46 to﹣1.30; P < 0.00001; I2 =93%), MAVO (MD = 4.90; 95% CI= 3.29-6.50; P < 0.00001; I2 =72%), MPVO (MD=5.82; 95% CI= 4.62-7.01; P < 0.00001; I2 =40%) and RLE (MD = 0.73; 95% CI= 0.23-1.22; P = 0.004; I2 = 0%) as compared to placebo group. However, there was no significant difference in LLE between two groups (MD= 0.35; 95% CI=﹣0.31-1.01; P = 0.30; I2 =0%). Conclusions: Laser therapy can effectively reduce pain but have small effect on improving mandibular movement of TMD patients. More well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes are needed for further validation. And these studies should report detailed laser parameters and provide complete outcome measure data. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Laser therapy 
690 |a Meta-analysis 
690 |a Temporomandibular joint disorders 
690 |a TMJ function 
690 |a Visual analog scale 
690 |a Other systems of medicine 
690 |a RZ201-999 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Vol 74, Iss , Pp 102945- (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229923000328 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0965-2299 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9e9aa5f23c8d411d8f815f4c8e21d7dd  |z Connect to this object online.