Are there benefits from using bone-borne maxillary expansion instead of tooth-borne maxillary expansion? A systematic review with meta-analysis
Abstract Background The aim of the current systematic review was to compare the clinical effects of bone-borne or hybrid tooth-bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with conventional tooth-borne RME in the treatment of maxillary deficiency. Methods Nine databases were searched up to September 2...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Marietta Krüsi (Author), Theodore Eliades (Author), Spyridon N. Papageorgiou (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
SpringerOpen,
2019-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Bone-Borne Maxillary Expansion and Traditional Rapid Maxillary Expansion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Amirreza Mashreghi, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Differential Benefit of Two Different Tooth-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances in Female Subjects
by: Lale Taner, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Short-term assessment of pain and discomfort during rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne appliances: randomized clinical trial
by: Bruno de Paula Machado PASQUA, et al.
Published: (2023) -
External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME
by: Rosalia Leonardi, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes between tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne hybrid nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansions in adults: a retrospective observational study
by: Jung-Sub An, et al.
Published: (2021)