ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERRORS IN SOLVING MINIMUM COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT PROBLEMS BASED ON KASTOLAN THEORY

In studying geometry, it is common for students to make various errors when working on word problems. Although some students understand the example problems, they may be confused and make errors when presented with different questions. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach to examin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Novita Anggraini (Author), Dwi Priyo Utomo (Author), Rizal Dian Azmi (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr HAMKA, 2023-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9fc67d327dcf4fbcb134a135c2c7fc0b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Novita Anggraini  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Dwi Priyo Utomo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rizal Dian Azmi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERRORS IN SOLVING MINIMUM COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT PROBLEMS BASED ON KASTOLAN THEORY 
260 |b Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr HAMKA,   |c 2023-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol8no1.2023pp1-10 
500 |a 2527-5615 
500 |a 2527-5607 
520 |a In studying geometry, it is common for students to make various errors when working on word problems. Although some students understand the example problems, they may be confused and make errors when presented with different questions. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach to examine the types and causes of errors made by Grade 8 students from a junior high school in Pronojiwo, Indonesia. The study involved 40 students, with six students selected for interviews. Data were collected using descriptions and interviews. The research employed three procedural stages: preparation, implementation, and data analysis. Data analysis involved data reduction, data encoding, and conclusions. The analysis revealed that 23.3% of students made conceptual errors, 27% made procedural errors, and 44.5% made technical errors. The factors contributing to these errors included students' lack of focus on reading the questions, limited understanding of the material, haste in completing the questions, insufficient knowledge of the problems in the questions, and carelessness in checking their answers. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Errors Analysis 
690 |a Kastolan's Theory 
690 |a Asessment Competency Minimum 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Education (General) 
690 |a L7-991 
690 |a Mathematics 
690 |a QA1-939 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Kalamatika, Vol 8, Iss 1 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.kalamatika.matematika-uhamka.com/index.php/kmk/article/view/555 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2527-5615 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2527-5607 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9fc67d327dcf4fbcb134a135c2c7fc0b  |z Connect to this object online.