Free communication presentations in sport medicine and science meetings and publication in indexed journals

• Main Authors: Igor Alexandre Fernandes (Author), Thiago da Silveira Álvares (Author), Sandro Marcos Arteiro (Author), Lauro Casqueiro Vianna (Author), Claudio Gil Soares de Araújo (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2008-07-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 1415-8426; 1980-0037; 10.5007/1980-0037.2008v10n1p50
• Keywords: Sports; GV557-1198.995; Medicine (General); R5-920
• Source: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 50-55 (2008)

http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2008v10n1p50 The main purpose of the study was to investigate the publication rate of free communications - oral and poster formats - presented at meetings of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and Centro de Estudos do Laboratório de Aptidão Física de São Caetano do Sul (CELAFISCS). We randomly selected 100 free communications (50 oral and 50 posters) in the CELAFISCS and ACSM meetings as well as those presented by Brazilian authors at the ACSM meetings, in the year 2001, and determined the publication rate during the following six years. A literature search was carried out on the following data bases: Scielo, Medline, Sport Discus, LILACS and EMBASE. The publication rate was higher at ACSM than at CELAFISCS for oral (30 vs. 12%, p = 0.003), poster (34 vs. 2%, p = 0.000) and oral + poster (32 vs. 7%, p = 0.000) free communications. No signifi cant difference was found in publication rates by free communication format - oral vs. poster - in the ACSM (30 vs. 34%, p = 0.649), as opposed to CELAFISCS (12 vs. 2%, p = 0.013) and to Brazilian authors presenting at the ACSM (56 vs. 26%, p = 0.000). These results may contribute to the decision-making processes of reviewers responsible for the concession of fi nancial support to researchers and scientifi c meetings. Future studies are needed in order to determine the reasons for these low publication rates.