Personal statement versus psychological test as admission to the nursing degree: an evaluation

Abstract Background A review of admissions to nursing in Northern Ireland was prompted by the growing number of applications and a desire to ensure that the applicants had the right values for a career in nursing. Concerns regarding authorship, plagiarism and reliability of personal statements used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marian Traynor (Author), Colin Mc Neill (Author), Audrey Roulston (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a06957c2495f4f02a3facb50f930fbc4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Marian Traynor  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Colin Mc Neill  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Audrey Roulston  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Personal statement versus psychological test as admission to the nursing degree: an evaluation 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12912-022-00919-w 
500 |a 1472-6955 
520 |a Abstract Background A review of admissions to nursing in Northern Ireland was prompted by the growing number of applications and a desire to ensure that the applicants had the right values for a career in nursing. Concerns regarding authorship, plagiarism and reliability of personal statements used to select applicants to interview was the focus of this research. This study evaluates the psychometric properties of a Personal Statement (PS) as a method for admission to a nursing programme and a values-based psychological screening tool, Nurse Match (NM). Methods A self-selecting, purposive sample (n = 228; 9.7%) was drawn from applicants to Schools of Nursing in the United Kingdom (n = 2350). Participants all of whom had completed a Personal Statement were asked to complete a psychological tool and the scoring outcomes and psychometric properties of both tests were investigated. Statistical analysis was conducted using Minitab 17. Results Applicants from 18 schools and five colleges responded. The majority (72.4%) were aged 18-19. Findings provide practical, theoretical, statistical, and qualitative reasons for concluding that the Personal Statement has substantial limitations as a measure of suitability. It does not compare well with international test standards for psychometric tests. In contrast, NM is a valid and reliable measure with good discriminatory power, standardised administration and consistent marking. Conclusion NM is a viable alternative to the PS for shortlisting applicants for nursing interviews. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Personal statement 
690 |a Psychometric test 
690 |a Psychological test 
690 |a Pre-registration nursing 
690 |a Admissions 
690 |a Nursing student 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Nursing, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00919-w 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6955 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a06957c2495f4f02a3facb50f930fbc4  |z Connect to this object online.