Comparison of the Anti-bacterial Efficacy of Saussurea costus and Melaleuca alternifolia Against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococcus mutans, and Enterococcus faecalis: An in-vitro Study

The aim was to compare the in-vitro antibacterial effectiveness of two herbal extracts (a) Saussurea-costus (S. costus) and (b) Melaleuca-alternifolia (M. alternifolia) against Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). Aqueous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munerah S. BinShabaib (Author), Shatha S. ALHarthi (Author), Bashayer S. Helaby (Author), Manar H. AlHefdhi (Author), Afrah E. Mohammed (Author), Kawther Aabed (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a0a429e38d074703b02b84d1f766efbe
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Munerah S. BinShabaib  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shatha S. ALHarthi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bashayer S. Helaby  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Manar H. AlHefdhi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Afrah E. Mohammed  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kawther Aabed  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of the Anti-bacterial Efficacy of Saussurea costus and Melaleuca alternifolia Against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococcus mutans, and Enterococcus faecalis: An in-vitro Study 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2673-4842 
500 |a 10.3389/froh.2022.950840 
520 |a The aim was to compare the in-vitro antibacterial effectiveness of two herbal extracts (a) Saussurea-costus (S. costus) and (b) Melaleuca-alternifolia (M. alternifolia) against Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). Aqueous extracts from M. alternifolia were prepared by adding 2 grams of S. costus and M. alternifolia, respectively to 100 ml distilled water. Bacterial strains of P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans were treated into 3 groups. In groups 1 and 2, bacterial strains were treated with aqueous extracts of S. costus and M. alternifolia, respectively. In the control-group, bacterial strains were exposed to distilled water. Antibacterial activity of the samples and nanoparticles was determined. The minimum-inhibitory-concentration (MIC) values were determined using the microdilution method. P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. The MIC for all bacterial strains treated with S. costus was significantly higher than that of M. alternifolia (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in MIC for strains of P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans treated with S. costus. For bacterial strains treated with M. alternifolia, the MIC was significantly higher for P. gingivalis compared with E. faecalis and S. mutans strains (P < 0.01). There was no difference in MIC for E. faecalis and S. mutans strains treated with M. alternifolia. The in-vitro antibacterial efficacy of M. alternifolia is higher than S. costus against P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Saussurea costus 
690 |a Melaleuca alternifolia 
690 |a tea tree oil 
690 |a essential oil 
690 |a antibacterial 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Oral Health, Vol 3 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/froh.2022.950840/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4842 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a0a429e38d074703b02b84d1f766efbe  |z Connect to this object online.