Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study

Objective: To compare the detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar by various techniques in the Indian population. Material and Methods: A total of 50 maxillary 1st molar cases were selected and sequentially divided into four groups: Group I: Naked eye; Group II: Surgical loupe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amit Kumar Garg (Author), Neha Agrawal (Author), Kulwinder Kaur Wadhwani (Author), Aseem Prakash Tikku (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB), 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a12ab2a717674c04aadc29b9f7e7a91b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Amit Kumar Garg  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Neha Agrawal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kulwinder Kaur Wadhwani  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aseem Prakash Tikku  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study 
260 |b Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB),   |c 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1519-0501 
500 |a 1983-4632 
520 |a Objective: To compare the detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar by various techniques in the Indian population. Material and Methods: A total of 50 maxillary 1st molar cases were selected and sequentially divided into four groups: Group I: Naked eye; Group II: Surgical loupe; Group III: Surgical operating microscope; and Group IV: Fluorescein sodium dye. After access opening, the number of root canal orifices was detected in all cases with these methods. Results: By naked eye and surgical loupe, a total of 171 root canal orifices were detected, by a surgical operating microscope, 176, and by fluorescein sodium dye, 177 root canal orifices were detected. The detection rate of root canal orifices is as follows: Group I (96.61%) = Group II (96.61%) < Group III (99.44%) < Group IV (100%) and detection rate of MB-2 canal orifices Group I (40%) = Group II (40%) < Group III (50%) < Group IV (52%). No significant difference in the number of canal orifices detected could be seen for any of the comparisons. No significant difference was observed between the naked eye and surgical loupe techniques. Although the surgical operating microscope detected more root canal orifices, it did not have a significantly higher detection than the other two techniques. Conclusion: No significant difference was seen among various methods. However, the use of a surgical operating microscope and fluorescein sodium dye increased the detection rate of root canal orifices. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Endodontics 
690 |a Molar 
690 |a Dental Pulp Cavity 
690 |a Root Canal Therapy 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada, Vol 21 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/734 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1519-0501 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1983-4632 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a12ab2a717674c04aadc29b9f7e7a91b  |z Connect to this object online.