An oral cavity profile in illicit- Drug abusers?

Background: The aim of this study is to shed the light on the oral cavity profile assessing teeth and periodontal tissues in previously illicit drug abusers of cannabis and heroin with different drug addiction circumstances. Materials and Methods: Study population included 100 inmates, aged 21-64 ye...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Mahmoud Al Bush (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a1a7e7c10cb141c2a9816e43f0ef75b7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Muhammad Mahmoud Al Bush  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An oral cavity profile in illicit- Drug abusers? 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0972-124X 
500 |a 10.4103/jisp.jisp_716_18 
520 |a Background: The aim of this study is to shed the light on the oral cavity profile assessing teeth and periodontal tissues in previously illicit drug abusers of cannabis and heroin with different drug addiction circumstances. Materials and Methods: Study population included 100 inmates, aged 21-64 years, incarcerated for previous addiction to cannabis or heroin. Personal information and drug circumstances of addiction were registered with dental and periodontal parameters including daily teeth brushing frequency, decayed missed filled teeth (DMFT), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), recession, and clinical attachment loss (CAL). Results: Half of the population were illiterate, and 70% were married. Heroin was the most previously abused drug and more than 70% of the participants had been addicted for more than 12 months. Low teeth brushing activity profile dominated with higher values for DMFT and BOP in the heroin group compared with the cannabis (after age adjustment) (DMFT = 22.6 ± 7.9, 18.5 ± 9.8, respectively, P = 0.03) (BOP = 60% ± 30%, 66.6% ± 32%, respectively). In addition, higher values of BOP were recorded in the heroin injecting group compared with both of heroin fumes inhalation and cannabis smoking (BOP = 76.41% ± 27.7%, 59.12% ± 33.6%, 60.05% ± 31.8% P = 0.04, respectively), whereas PI, GI, Reces, and CAL means were comparable among groups regardless of other addiction circumstances. Conclusion: Abused drug type and the way its chemical form being administered would negatively affect, directly or indirectly, the oral cavity concomitantly with the sustained state of self-negligence and less interest in implementing the oral hygiene measurements. Altogether, addiction circumstances synergize leading to a distinctive dental and oral profile which would impose a burden to adapt a more customized treatment approach. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a dental profile 
690 |a oral cavity 
690 |a periodontal indices 
690 |a prison inmates 
690 |a substance abuse 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, Vol 23, Iss 6, Pp 517-524 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2019;volume=23;issue=6;spage=517;epage=524;aulast=Al 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0972-124X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a1a7e7c10cb141c2a9816e43f0ef75b7  |z Connect to this object online.