Effect of Methods of Biosilicate Microparticle Application on Dentin Adhesion

Restorative procedures associated with bioglasses have shown to be a strategy to satisfy the contemporary concept of minimally invasive dentistry. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate bond strength to dentin treated by two different methods of biosilicate microparticle application. Dentin sur...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

সংরক্ষণ করুন:
গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Michelle Alexandra Chinelatti (Author), Egle Leitão Santos (Author), Camila Tirapelli (Author), Fernanda Carvalho Panzeri Pires- (Author)
বিন্যাস: গ্রন্থ
প্রকাশিত: MDPI AG, 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z.
বিষয়গুলি:
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:Connect to this object online.
ট্যাগগুলো: ট্যাগ যুক্ত করুন
কোনো ট্যাগ নেই, প্রথমজন হিসাবে ট্যাগ করুন!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a1d5dd5b3ef74e9f8fe2e5d2b91c0ddb
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Michelle Alexandra Chinelatti  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Egle Leitão Santos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Camila Tirapelli  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fernanda Carvalho Panzeri Pires-  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effect of Methods of Biosilicate Microparticle Application on Dentin Adhesion 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2304-6767 
500 |a 10.3390/dj7020035 
520 |a Restorative procedures associated with bioglasses have shown to be a strategy to satisfy the contemporary concept of minimally invasive dentistry. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate bond strength to dentin treated by two different methods of biosilicate microparticle application. Dentin surfaces from 30 sound human molars were exposed and randomly assigned into three groups (<i>n</i> = 10) according to the surface treatment: (1) blasting with biosilicate microparticles (distance = 1 cm/pressure = 5 bar/time = 1 min); (2) 10% biosilicate microparticles paste; and (3) control (no treatment). After, dentin surfaces were restored with self-etch adhesive (Adper Easy Bond) and nanofilled composite (Filtek Z350). Specimens were sectioned perpendicularly to the adhesive interface to obtain sticks (cross-section area = 1 mm<sup>2</sup>), which were submitted to microtensile test (0.5 mm/min; 50 kgf). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 5%). Dentin/adhesive interfaces were morphologically analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data analysis showed that biosilicate-treated groups reached similar results (<i>p</i> > 0.05) and both of them demonstrated higher values (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than control group. SEM micrographs revealed hybridization with clear resin tags and no separation between resin-dentin adhesive interfaces. Within the limitations of this study, surface treatment with biosilicate positively influenced the adhesion to dentin and does not alter the morphology of the adhesive interface. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a dentin 
690 |a surface treatment 
690 |a micro-tensile 
690 |a hybrid layer 
690 |a bioglass 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dentistry Journal, Vol 7, Iss 2, p 35 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/7/2/35 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2304-6767 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a1d5dd5b3ef74e9f8fe2e5d2b91c0ddb  |z Connect to this object online.