Critical Synthesis Package: Script Concordance Testing (SCT)

Abstract This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Script Concordance Test (SCT), and (2) a copy of the SCT instrument and SCT Overview developed by Bernard Charlin, MD, PhD. The SCT provides...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Javarro Russell (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2013-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a28224321ac443209a6e94aa167ffe25
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Javarro Russell  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Critical Synthesis Package: Script Concordance Testing (SCT) 
260 |b Association of American Medical Colleges,   |c 2013-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9492 
500 |a 2374-8265 
520 |a Abstract This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Script Concordance Test (SCT), and (2) a copy of the SCT instrument and SCT Overview developed by Bernard Charlin, MD, PhD. The SCT provides a method for assessing clinical data interpretation skills. This method uses a written simulation item format to allow respondents to address ill-defined problems typical to clinical practice. The examinee is presented with ill-defined clinical scenarios. These scenarios are then followed by a set of hypotheses. For each hypothesis the examinee is provided with an additional piece of information. The examinee is then required to make judgments as to the likelihood of the hypothesis by selecting a Likert-type response option. Points awarded for the examinee's concordance with the judgments are provided by a panel of expert judges. The SCT has been used across many clinical domains and with examinees of varying levels of clinical experience. Research on the SCT has identified guidelines for developing quality test items. An advantage of using this item format is the use of expert panels to analyze and compare examinee responses. Disadvantages to using this item format include the lack of validity evidence for the response process and the complexity of the scoring process. Further research is needed to determine how best to use the SCT to improve teaching and learning, and to evaluate the thought process that is used in responding to the SCT items. Additionally, research is needed to identify how best to use examinee scores diagnostically. Current research has not obtained validity evidence for the use of scores to prescribe educational interventions to increase examinee knowledge. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Educational Measurement 
690 |a DREAM 
690 |a Directory and Repository of Educational Assessment Measures 
690 |a Script Concordance Testing 
690 |a SCT 
690 |a Instrument Validation 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n MedEdPORTAL, Vol 9 (2013) 
787 0 |n http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9492 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2374-8265 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a28224321ac443209a6e94aa167ffe25  |z Connect to this object online.