Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial)

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of polyethylene fiber reinforced resin composite fillings compared to bulk fill resin composite fillings in endodontically treated teeth over a two-year monitoring period. Method A total of 240 individuals with endodontically tre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Abdelsattar Metwaly (Author), Amira Farid Elzoghby (Author), Rawda Hesham Abd ElAziz (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a2aac1b15a384d29b32b9d56289b5dbd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ahmed Abdelsattar Metwaly  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Amira Farid Elzoghby  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rawda Hesham Abd ElAziz  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial) 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8 
500 |a 1472-6831 
520 |a Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of polyethylene fiber reinforced resin composite fillings compared to bulk fill resin composite fillings in endodontically treated teeth over a two-year monitoring period. Method A total of 240 individuals with endodontically treated lower molars and a moderate amount of tooth structure were divided into two equal groups of 120 each. One group received polyethylene fiber reinforced bulk fill resin composite restorations while the other group received only bulk fill resin composite restorations, both applied as per manufacturer guidelines. Two proficient experienced blinded assessors assessed the restorations using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. Statistical analysis used Data analysis involved the utilization of Mann-Whitney U, Friedman's test, and Nemenyi post hoc test, with age data being displayed as mean and standard deviation. The significance level was established as p < 0.05, and R software was utilized for statistical analysis. Results There were no notable distinctions in any parameters or scores between the intervention and comparator groups at various time points. Alpha scores were present for retention, gross fracture, and secondary caries at all follow up intervals. Conclusion Both direct resin composite restorations reinforced with polyethylene fibers and direct bulk fill resin composite restorations placed in endodontically treated molars with moderate remaining tooth structure demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes during a 24-month follow-up period. Clinical relevance Bulk fill resin composites directly placed in endodontically treated molars with moderate remaining tooth structure showed promise as a treatment option over a two-year period. Clinical trial registration (06-01-2022) on https://ClinicalTrials.gov with the ID (NCT05180903). 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Fiber reinforced composite 
690 |a Teeth that have undergone endodontic treatment 
690 |a Ribbond 
690 |a Clinical trial that is controlled and randomized 
690 |a Polyethylene fibers 
690 |a Class II cavities 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Oral Health, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6831 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a2aac1b15a384d29b32b9d56289b5dbd  |z Connect to this object online.