Cefadroxil is an option for Gram-positive bone and joint infections in adults

Background: Oral antimicrobial therapy for osteoarticular infections in adults is increasingly adopted; however, the preponderance of published data and experience with oral antibiotics involves agents such as fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and clindamycin. Data supporting the use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kennedy Kluthe (Author), Rachael Johnson (Author), Nicolas Cortes-Penfield (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Cambridge University Press, 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a2f5b7467a5e4a3a9ca5e811640394d7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kennedy Kluthe  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rachael Johnson  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nicolas Cortes-Penfield  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Cefadroxil is an option for Gram-positive bone and joint infections in adults 
260 |b Cambridge University Press,   |c 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1017/ash.2024.143 
500 |a 2732-494X 
520 |a Background: Oral antimicrobial therapy for osteoarticular infections in adults is increasingly adopted; however, the preponderance of published data and experience with oral antibiotics involves agents such as fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and clindamycin. Data supporting the use of narrower-spectrum, stewardship-friendly oral antibiotics with favorable toxicities profiles (e.g. cefadroxil) are needed. Methods: We report a case series of adults who underwent surgery for monomicrobial Gram-positive osteomyelitis, native joint septic arthritis (NJSA), prosthetic joint infection (PJI), or other orthopedic hardware infection at our institution from January 2019 through January 2022 and who subsequently received at least two weeks of oral cefadroxil. We excluded patients who had polymicrobial infection or curative amputation, or who received cefadroxil only as suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). Our primary outcome of interest was treatment success during followup, defined as freedom from death, unplanned surgery for infection, or readmission for worsening infection. Results: We identified 22 patients who received cefadroxil for primary treatment of osteoarticular infection. The mean age was 57.6 years, mean weight 98.6 kg, 68% were male, and none had peripheral vascular disease. Infections included PJI in 12, NJSA in 8, osteomyelitis in 7, and other hardware infections in 5; some patients had multiple infectious syndromes. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most common pathogen (73%), followed by streptococci (18%), other methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (14%), and Cutibacterium acnes (5%). Half of patients received 120kg who had device infections with MSSA, two of which were managed with implant retention, suggesting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic factors and biofilm burden could influence treatment outcome. Limitations of this study include its small sample size, noncomparative nature, lengthy initial intravenous antibiotic durations, and limited durations of followup. These data suggest cefadroxil merits investigation for adult osteoarticular infection in larger comparative (and ideally, prospective randomized) studies. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Infectious and parasitic diseases 
690 |a RC109-216 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology, Vol 4, Pp s34-s34 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2732494X24001438/type/journal_article 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2732-494X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a2f5b7467a5e4a3a9ca5e811640394d7  |z Connect to this object online.