Barriers and facilitators related to healthcare practitioner use of real time prescription monitoring tools in Australia

IntroductionReal time prescription monitoring tools have been implemented in Australia to address the growing concerns of drug misuse, drug-related mortality and morbidity. The objective of this pilot study is to investigate the barriers and facilitators related to healthcare practitioner use of rea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dimi Hoppe (Author), Chaojie Liu (Author), Hanan Khalil (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a34b527ad6a6422ea30ce6741aade410
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Dimi Hoppe  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chaojie Liu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hanan Khalil  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Barriers and facilitators related to healthcare practitioner use of real time prescription monitoring tools in Australia 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1175791 
520 |a IntroductionReal time prescription monitoring tools have been implemented in Australia to address the growing concerns of drug misuse, drug-related mortality and morbidity. The objective of this pilot study is to investigate the barriers and facilitators related to healthcare practitioner use of real time prescription monitoring tools.MethodsAn online survey was distributed to Australian prescribers and pharmacists who use a real time prescription monitoring tool. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses.ResultsA total of 102 questionnaires were analyzed. Practitioners mainly agreed that the tool was easy to use (n = 64; 66.7%) and access (n = 56; 57.7%), and the data was easy to interpret (n = 77; 79.4%). Over half agreed that they wanted training to guide clinical actions (n = 52; 55.9%) and clinical guidelines or guidance on what to do with the RTPM findings (n = 51; 54.8%). Prescribers were more likely to report difficulties with workplace access to a computer or the internet (n = 7; 21.2%) compared with pharmacists (n = 6; 9.2%; p = 0.037). Practitioners working in community settings (n = 59; 57.9%; p = 0.022) and those with 1-10 years practice experience (n = 45; 44.2%; p = 0.036) were more likely to want training to guide clinical actions in response to RTPM information.ConclusionThis is the first known study to investigate the barriers and facilitators related to practitioner use of RTPM tools in Australia. The results from this study can inform further research to gain an understanding of healthcare practitioners use of RTPM tools, and how to minimize barriers and optimize use for the essential delivery of quality healthcare. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a real time prescription monitoring 
690 |a prescription drug monitoring programs 
690 |a healthcare 
690 |a pharmacists 
690 |a prescribers 
690 |a barriers 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 11 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1175791/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a34b527ad6a6422ea30ce6741aade410  |z Connect to this object online.