Evaluation of dry needling and 0.5% lidocaine injection therapies in myofascial pain trigger points in masticatory muscles

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of trigger points injections using lidocaine 0.5% and dry needling without any kind of home-based rehabilitation program. METHODS: Sixteen patients with myofascial pain and trigger points in masticatory muscles were randomly assig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renato Oliveira Ferreira da Silva (Author), Paulo César Rodrigues Conti (Author), Carlos dos Reis Pereira Araújo (Author), Rafael dos Santos Silva (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Dental Press Editora, 2012-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a3a36c07e9f64a94bccc85d5e31b8c3a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Renato Oliveira Ferreira da Silva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Paulo César Rodrigues Conti  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carlos dos Reis Pereira Araújo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rafael dos Santos Silva  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of dry needling and 0.5% lidocaine injection therapies in myofascial pain trigger points in masticatory muscles 
260 |b Dental Press Editora,   |c 2012-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1590/S2176-94512012000200020 
500 |a 2176-9451 
500 |a 2177-6709 
520 |a OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of trigger points injections using lidocaine 0.5% and dry needling without any kind of home-based rehabilitation program. METHODS: Sixteen patients with myofascial pain and trigger points in masticatory muscles were randomly assigned to two groups and received only one application session. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) was recorded before and after the injection: Ten minutes, 24 hours later, 7, 15, 21 and 30 days after the treatment. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to in all evaluation periods. RESULTS: There were no difference between groups for PPT, but for all groups the PPT during the time significantly increased when compared the before treatment. VAS showed differences between groups and during the time. The 0.5% lidocaine had the lowest VAS values when compared to dry needling, but at 30 days there were no differences among them. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences in VAS and considering there were no differences in PPT increases, we concluded that, in this study, both groups were able to disrupt the mechanisms of trigger point and relieve the myofascial pain symptoms. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Myofascial pain 
690 |a Trigger point 
690 |a Needling therapies 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 17, Iss 2, Pp 113-118 (2012) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000200020 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2176-9451 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6709 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a3a36c07e9f64a94bccc85d5e31b8c3a  |z Connect to this object online.