Cover Image

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil

Abstract Purpose To assess cases of labor induction with vaginal 25-μg tablets of misoprostol and maternal outcomes in a tertiary hospital in southeastern Brazil. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 412 pregnant women with indication for labor induction. Labor induction was performed wi...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Tácito Augusto Godoy Silva (Author), Luciano Eliziário Borges Júnior (Author), Luisa Almeida Tahan (Author), Taynná Ferreira Arantes Costa (Author), Fernanda Oliveira Magalhães (Author), Alberto Borges Peixoto (Author), Wellington de Paula Martins (Author), Edward Araujo Júnior (Author)
Format:	Book
Published:	Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 2017-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:	article
Online Access:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
by: Paulo César Praciano Souza, et al.
Published: (2017)

The effect of propranolol plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone on induction of labor
by: Atieh Mohammadzadeh Vatanchi, et al.
Published: (2021)

Pilot Study of Labor Induction with Titrated oral Misoprostol
by: Shi-Yann Cheng, et al.
Published: (2006)

Misoprostol for term labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
by: Gulshan A. Saeed, et al.
Published: (2011)

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
by: Masoumeh Dadashaliha, et al.
Published: (2021)

Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone
by: Aqueela Ayaz
Published: (2010)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
by: Yana Vorontsova, et al.
Published: (2022)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
by: Rachel Towns, et al.
Published: (2017)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
by: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Published: (2006)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
by: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Published: (2006)

Indução do Parto com Misoprostol: Comparação entre duas Doses Labor Induction with Misoprostol: Comparison of Two Dose Regimens
by: Dimas Augusto Carvalho de Araújo, et al.
Published: (1999)

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study
by: Elizabeth H. Harman Crowell, et al.
Published: (2019)

Pre-induction of labor with misoprostol. A useful option in antepartum cervical ripening
by: Yoan Hernández Cabrera, et al.
Published: (2017)

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTS OF ORAL MISOPROSTOL ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH INTRACERVICAL FOLEY'S IN INDUCTION OF LABOR
by: Dania Junaid, et al.
Published: (2019)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
by: Kjersti Engen Marsdal, et al.
Published: (2018)

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with and without hypertensive syndromes submitted to induction of labor with misoprostol
by: Rossana Mariana Carvalho de Paiva Marques, et al.
Published: (2017)

A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations
by: Stephenson ML, et al.
Published: (2015)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
by: Patte C, et al.
Published: (2015)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto a termo Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction of term pregnancies
by: Olímpio Barbosa de Moraes Filho, et al.
Published: (2005)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
by: Daniele Bolla, et al.
Published: (2018)

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
by: Ahmed Sherif Abdel Hamid, et al.
Published: (2023)

Baixas doses de misoprostol vaginal (12,5 versus 25 mcg) para indução do parto a termo Low-dose vaginal misoprostol (12.5 versus 25 µg) for induction of labor at term
by: Francisco Airton Rangel Filho, et al.
Published: (2007)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
by: Zohreh Tabasi, et al.
Published: (2020)

Eficácia de dinoprostone e misoprostol para indução do trabalho de parto em nulíparas Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women
by: Tenilson Amaral Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2011)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
by: Alfred Osoti, et al.
Published: (2018)

Uso de misoprostol retal para indução do parto em gestantes com amniorrexe prematura: ensaio clínico fase II Use of rectal misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes: a phase II clinical trial
by: Francisco Carlos Nogueira Arcanjo, et al.
Published: (2003)

Baixa dose de misoprostol sublingual (12,5 µg) para indução do parto Low dose of sublingual misoprostol (12.5 µg) for labor induction
by: Daniele Sofia de Moraes Barros Gattás, et al.
Published: (2012)

Sublingual misoprostol versus dinoprostone gel in labour induction
by: Juveria Jahangir, et al.
Published: (2020)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
by: Nasreen Noor, et al.
Published: (2015)

Estudo comparativo entre misoprostol e placebo para o amadurecimento cervical e indução do parto A randomized trial of misoprostol and placebo for cervical ripening and induction of labor
by: Renata Murad Macedo, et al.
Published: (1998)

Labor induction with combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol alone at term gestation-a randomized studyAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
by: Anjali DNB, et al.
Published: (2022)

Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
by: Sven Kehl, et al.
Published: (2019)

Isosorbide mononitrate followed by misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a randomized controlled trial
by: Shikha Agarwal, et al.
Published: (2022)

Oral versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction : A Comparative Study
by: Eke P Mahacakri, et al.
Published: (2018)

Beliefs and practices in using misoprostol for induction of labour among obstetricians in Zimbabwe
by: M Madziyire, et al.
Published: (2017)

Role of Combination OF Mifepristone and Misoprostol Verses Misoprostol alone in Induction of Labour in Late Intrauterin Fetal Death: A Prospective Study.
by: Subrat Panda, et al.
Published: (2013)

Effect of misoprostol with and without evening primrose (Oenothera biennis) on induction of missed abortion
by: Mozhgan Mahmoodinasab, et al.
Published: (2023)

The effect of induction duration on postabortal hemorrhage in second-trimester pregnancy termination with misoprostol
by: Mehmet Murat Işıkalan, et al.
Published: (2022)

Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial
by: Daniele S. M. B. Gattás, et al.
Published: (2020)

Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial protocol
by: Daniele Sofia Moraes Barros Gattás, et al.
Published: (2018)