Comparisons between different blood pressure measurement techniques in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background : Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) machines measure blood pressure (BP) multiple times over a brief period. We aimed to compare the results of manual office blood pressure (MOBP) and AOBP methods with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Met...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Shahrokh Ezzatzadegan Jahromi (Автор), Ghasem Haghighi (Автор), Jamshid Roozbeh (Автор), Vahid Ebrahimi (Автор)
Формат:
Опубликовано: The Korean Society of Nephrology, 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Предметы:
Online-ссылка:Connect to this object online.
Метки: Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a54c48bfbc0a4bd1a7f785aa6dc40eb4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shahrokh Ezzatzadegan Jahromi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ghasem Haghighi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jamshid Roozbeh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vahid Ebrahimi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparisons between different blood pressure measurement techniques in patients with chronic kidney disease 
260 |b The Korean Society of Nephrology,   |c 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2211-9132 
500 |a 10.23876/j.krcp.18.0109 
520 |a Background : Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) machines measure blood pressure (BP) multiple times over a brief period. We aimed to compare the results of manual office blood pressure (MOBP) and AOBP methods with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods : This study was performed on 64 patients with CKD (stages 3-4). A nurse manually measured the BP on both arms using a mercury sphygmomanometer, followed by AOBP of the arm with the higher BP and then ABPM. Mean BP readings were compared by paired t test and Bland-Altman graphs. Results : The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of participants was 59.3 ± 13.6. The mean ± SD awake systolic BP obtained by ABPM was 140.2 ± 19.0 mmHg, which was lower than the MOBP and AOBP methods (156.6 ± 17.8 and 148.8 ± 18.6 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001). The mean ± SD awake diastolic BP was 78.6 ± 13.2 mmHg by ABPM which was lower than the MOBP and AOBP methods (88.9 ± 13.2 and 84.1 ± 14.0 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001). Using Bland-Altman graphs, MOBP systolic BP readings showed a bias of 16.4 mmHg, while AOBP measurements indicated a bias of 8.6 mmHg compared with ABPM. Conclusion : AOBP methods may be more reliable than MOBP methods for determining BP in patients with CKD. However, the significantly higher mean BPs recorded by AOBP method suggested that AOBPs may not be as accurate as ABPM in patients with CKD. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a KO 
690 |a Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 
690 |a Chronic renal insufficiency 
690 |a Hypertension 
690 |a Sphygmomanometers 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
690 |a Specialties of internal medicine 
690 |a RC581-951 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, Vol 38, Iss 2, Pp 212-219 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.18.0109 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2211-9132 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a54c48bfbc0a4bd1a7f785aa6dc40eb4  |z Connect to this object online.