An Assessment of the Language Learning Attitudes, Learning Strategies, Language Proficiency of First Year College Students

This descriptive-correlational research described the Language Learning Attitudes (LLA), Language Learning Strategies (LLS) and Language Proficiency (LP) of 120 college students from 4 courses. It employed Lunsford's Standardized LLA Questionnaire, Oxford's (1994) Strategy Inventory of Lan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nelson Julhamid (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Philippine Association of Institutions for Research, Inc., 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a5a225cbc75a43a0b1b43fd88b92a1f5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nelson Julhamid  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An Assessment of the Language Learning Attitudes, Learning Strategies, Language Proficiency of First Year College Students 
260 |b Philippine Association of Institutions for Research, Inc.,   |c 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2012-3981 
500 |a 2244-0445 
500 |a 10.7719/jpair.v36i1.680 
520 |a This descriptive-correlational research described the Language Learning Attitudes (LLA), Language Learning Strategies (LLS) and Language Proficiency (LP) of 120 college students from 4 courses. It employed Lunsford's Standardized LLA Questionnaire, Oxford's (1994) Strategy Inventory of Language Learning (SILL); and Reading Proficiency Test.  It used mean, standard deviation, Pearson r, Multiple Regressions, t-Test of significant difference, and One-Way ANOVA for treatment of data.  This study found out that students are Average in LLA; "Somewhat true of me" in LLS and Poor in reading proficiency. No significant relationship between respondents' LLA and reading proficiency; Very low correlation between respondents' LLS and reading proficiency; Sex and course do not affect students' LLA and do not influence the latter's contribution on reading proficiency except for the inferential level; and Sex does not influence respondents' LLS and reading proficiency except course.  This study hardly provides empirical data to support the theories in LLA and LLS which are supposed to have a significant role in affecting students' reading proficiency. It also denies the role of schema theory in reading by activating learners' prior knowledge to process meaning and concepts from the reading selections.  Variable course may seem to provide empirical support to the extension of the theories in LLS as well as schema theory in reading. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a english language earning attitudes 
690 |a language learning strategies 
690 |a language proficiency 
690 |a Social Sciences 
690 |a H 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n JPAIR, Vol 36, Iss 1, Pp 35-57 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://philair.ph/index.php/jpair/article/view/680 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2012-3981 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2244-0445 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a5a225cbc75a43a0b1b43fd88b92a1f5  |z Connect to this object online.