Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review

The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a comb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vincenzo Quinzi (Author), Alessandro Polizzi (Author), Vincenzo Ronsivalle (Author), Simona Santonocito (Author), Cristina Conforte (Author), Rebecca Jewel Manenti (Author), Gaetano Isola (Author), Antonino Lo Giudice (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a5c21ff94f0c4e3aade49d3d0e79edc4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Vincenzo Quinzi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alessandro Polizzi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vincenzo Ronsivalle  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Simona Santonocito  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cristina Conforte  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rebecca Jewel Manenti  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gaetano Isola  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Antonino Lo Giudice  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/children9091390 
500 |a 2227-9067 
520 |a The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a combination of Mesh terms and free text words pooled through boolean operators on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and OpenGrey. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Stationary stereophotogrammetry devices showed a mean accuracy that ranged from 0.087 to 0.860 mm, portable stereophotogrammetry scanners from 0.150 to 0.849 mm, and smartphones from 0.460 to 1.400 mm. Regarding the risk of bias assessment, fourteen papers showed an overall low risk, three articles had unclear risk and four articles had high risk. Although smartphones showed less performance on deep and irregular surfaces, all the analyzed devices were sufficiently accurate for clinical application. Internal depth-sensing cameras or external infrared structured-light depth-sensing cameras plugged into smartphones/tablets increased the accuracy. These devices are portable and inexpensive but require greater operator experience and patient compliance for the incremented time of acquisition. Stationary stereophotogrammetry is the gold standard for greater accuracy and shorter acquisition time, avoiding motion artifacts. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a accuracy 
690 |a 3D facial scanning 
690 |a smartphones 
690 |a stereophotogrammetry 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a RJ1-570 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Children, Vol 9, Iss 9, p 1390 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/9/9/1390 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a5c21ff94f0c4e3aade49d3d0e79edc4  |z Connect to this object online.