The effect of laboratory procedures and repeated-glazing on color of metal-ceramic restoration

Background: Routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed effect the final color of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs). Clinicians wonder if the color changes after routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed is clinically acceptable or not. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hatice Özdemir (Author), Zeynep Yesil Duymus (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a5da7b98d7ff4155b6963f2ce5a3f0f6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hatice Özdemir  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zeynep Yesil Duymus  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The effect of laboratory procedures and repeated-glazing on color of metal-ceramic restoration 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0976-237X 
500 |a 0976-2361 
500 |a 10.4103/ccd.ccd_411_18 
520 |a Background: Routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed effect the final color of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs). Clinicians wonder if the color changes after routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed is clinically acceptable or not. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the color changes of MCRs after routine laboratory procedures and then glazed for 1, 2, and 3 times. Materials and Methods: Forty-five disc-shaped (10-mm diameter and 1-mm thickness) specimens were fabricated from Cr-Co metal-alloy. Bonding agent, first and second layer of shade A2opaque porcelain (OP) were applied on the metal specimens. The color of specimens was measured with a spectrophotometer after each procedure and △E1, △E2,and △E3values were calculated. Shade A2feldspathic porcelain was applied (2-mm thickness) to all specimens. Glaze was applied on the porcelain for 1, 2, and 3 times and then, the color measured after each procedure and △E4, △E5, and △E6values were calculated. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Duncan test (P < 0.05). Results: △E1that was obtained between the first layer of OP and bonding agent showed the greatest value. △E2that was obtained between the second and first layer of OP showed the lowest value. After repeated glazed procedures, the final color of the specimens was changed; but, these changes were clinically acceptable (△E < 5.5). Conclusions: The routine laboratory procedures and glazed for 1,2, and 3 times is effect the color of MCRs; but, the color changes were clinically acceptable (△E < 5.5). 
546 |a EN 
690 |a color change 
690 |a glaze 
690 |a laboratory procedures 
690 |a metal-ceramic restoration 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 239-242 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=239;epage=242;aulast=Özdemir 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-237X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-2361 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a5da7b98d7ff4155b6963f2ce5a3f0f6  |z Connect to this object online.