The effect of laboratory procedures and repeated-glazing on color of metal-ceramic restoration
Background: Routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed effect the final color of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs). Clinicians wonder if the color changes after routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed is clinically acceptable or not. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_a5da7b98d7ff4155b6963f2ce5a3f0f6 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Hatice Özdemir |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Zeynep Yesil Duymus |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a The effect of laboratory procedures and repeated-glazing on color of metal-ceramic restoration |
260 | |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, |c 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 0976-237X | ||
500 | |a 0976-2361 | ||
500 | |a 10.4103/ccd.ccd_411_18 | ||
520 | |a Background: Routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed effect the final color of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs). Clinicians wonder if the color changes after routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed is clinically acceptable or not. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the color changes of MCRs after routine laboratory procedures and then glazed for 1, 2, and 3 times. Materials and Methods: Forty-five disc-shaped (10-mm diameter and 1-mm thickness) specimens were fabricated from Cr-Co metal-alloy. Bonding agent, first and second layer of shade A2opaque porcelain (OP) were applied on the metal specimens. The color of specimens was measured with a spectrophotometer after each procedure and △E1, △E2,and △E3values were calculated. Shade A2feldspathic porcelain was applied (2-mm thickness) to all specimens. Glaze was applied on the porcelain for 1, 2, and 3 times and then, the color measured after each procedure and △E4, △E5, and △E6values were calculated. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Duncan test (P < 0.05). Results: △E1that was obtained between the first layer of OP and bonding agent showed the greatest value. △E2that was obtained between the second and first layer of OP showed the lowest value. After repeated glazed procedures, the final color of the specimens was changed; but, these changes were clinically acceptable (△E < 5.5). Conclusions: The routine laboratory procedures and glazed for 1,2, and 3 times is effect the color of MCRs; but, the color changes were clinically acceptable (△E < 5.5). | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a color change | ||
690 | |a glaze | ||
690 | |a laboratory procedures | ||
690 | |a metal-ceramic restoration | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 239-242 (2019) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=239;epage=242;aulast=Özdemir | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-237X | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-2361 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/a5da7b98d7ff4155b6963f2ce5a3f0f6 |z Connect to this object online. |