Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria

Background: Malaria diagnosis using microscopy is currently the gold standard. However, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) were developed to simplify the diagnosis in regions without access to functional microscopy. Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mRDT...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan (Author), Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan (Author), Anthony I. Nwajei (Author)
Format: Book
Published: AOSIS, 2020-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a63f4087a7924c6a9f7c6d805e82c232
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anthony I. Nwajei  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria 
260 |b AOSIS,   |c 2020-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2071-2928 
500 |a 2071-2936 
500 |a 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2212 
520 |a Background: Malaria diagnosis using microscopy is currently the gold standard. However, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) were developed to simplify the diagnosis in regions without access to functional microscopy. Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mRDT CareStatTM with microscopy. Setting: This study was conducted in the paediatric primary care clinic of the Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional study for diagnostic accuracy was conducted from May 2016 to October 2016. Ninety-eight participants were involved to obtain a precision of 5%, sensitivity of mRDT CareStatTM of 95% from published work and 95% level of confidence after adjusting for 20% non-response rate or missing data. Consecutive participants were tested using both microscopy and mRDT. The results were analysed using EPI Info Version 7. Results: A total of 98 children aged 3-59 months were enrolled. Malaria prevalence was found to be 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46% - 60%), whilst sensitivity and specificity were 29% (95% CI = 20% - 38%) and 89% (95% CI = 83% - 95%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 75% (95% CI = 66.4% - 83.6%) and 53% (95% CI = 46% - 60%), respectively. Conclusion: Agreement between malaria parasitaemia using microscopy and mRDT positivity increased with increase in the parasite density. The mRDT might be negative when malaria parasite density using microscopy is low. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a FR 
690 |a family medicine 
690 |a primary care 
690 |a education 
690 |a mrdt 
690 |a parasite density 
690 |a sensitivity 
690 |a specificity 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp e1-e8 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/2212 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2071-2928 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2071-2936 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a63f4087a7924c6a9f7c6d805e82c232  |z Connect to this object online.