Comparison of routine teaching with fishbowl and 1-min preceptor for dental undergraduate students: An interventional study

Aim: To compare routine teaching method with fishbowl and a one-minute preceptor for undergraduate students. Objectives: 1. Evaluation of theoretical knowledge for WHO dentition status and treatment need by fish bowl and routine teaching. 2. Effectiveness of the combination of fish bowl and one-minu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shefalika Priyam (Author), Roopali M Sankeshwari (Author), Supriya Vyavahare (Author), Anil V Ankola (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a6fe07b801234fcebea9302e18c36c2f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shefalika Priyam  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Roopali M Sankeshwari  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Supriya Vyavahare  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anil V Ankola  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of routine teaching with fishbowl and 1-min preceptor for dental undergraduate students: An interventional study 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0970-9290 
500 |a 1998-3603 
500 |a 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_231_18 
520 |a Aim: To compare routine teaching method with fishbowl and a one-minute preceptor for undergraduate students. Objectives: 1. Evaluation of theoretical knowledge for WHO dentition status and treatment need by fish bowl and routine teaching. 2. Effectiveness of the combination of fish bowl and one-minute preceptor in understanding WHO dentition status and treatment need. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 38 third year undergraduate students, which was divided into two groups (Group A: Fishbowl, Group B: One-minute preceptor). Routine lecture for WHO dentition status and treatment need was taken, followed by baseline evaluation which was done by giving 10 sets of clinical images to students and asked them to give WHO score. Furthermore, fish bowl and one-minute preceptor method were performed and students were subjected with the same set of clinical images again. At the end of the session, feedback was taken from the students by means of five open-ended questions about their views on fish bowl and one-minute preceptor. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 20 (Chicago IL). Wilcoxon Sign Rank test and Mann Whitney 'U' test was performed for intragroup and intergroup comparison respectively. Results: Combination of fishbowl and one-minute preceptor shows statistically significant result over routine teaching method with P value of .000. Conclusion: Combination of Fish Bowl and OMP could be used for better teaching method for students, as the students are actively involved and more learning takes place; the deficiencies of one method would be compensated by the other. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a 1-min preceptor 
690 |a dental education 
690 |a fishbowl 
690 |a treatment need 
690 |a undergraduate 
690 |a who dentition status 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Indian Journal of Dental Research, Vol 31, Iss 1, Pp 48-52 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2020;volume=31;issue=1;spage=48;epage=52;aulast=Priyam 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0970-9290 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3603 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a6fe07b801234fcebea9302e18c36c2f  |z Connect to this object online.