COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis

BackgroundVaccination is a cornerstone of the prevention of communicable infectious diseases; however, vaccines have traditionally met with public fear and hesitancy, and COVID-19 vaccines are no exception. Social media use has been demonstrated to play a role in the low acceptance of vaccines. Obje...

Popoln opis

Shranjeno v:
Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors: Joanne Chen Lyu (Author), Eileen Le Han (Author), Garving K Luli (Author)
Format: Knjiga
Izdano: JMIR Publications, 2021-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Teme:
Online dostop:Connect to this object online.
Oznake: Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a75fc4d6e1b34fbca42b42db0daac50b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Joanne Chen Lyu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eileen Le Han  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Garving K Luli  |e author 
245 0 0 |a COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis 
260 |b JMIR Publications,   |c 2021-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1438-8871 
500 |a 10.2196/24435 
520 |a BackgroundVaccination is a cornerstone of the prevention of communicable infectious diseases; however, vaccines have traditionally met with public fear and hesitancy, and COVID-19 vaccines are no exception. Social media use has been demonstrated to play a role in the low acceptance of vaccines. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to identify the topics and sentiments in the public COVID-19 vaccine-related discussion on social media and discern the salient changes in topics and sentiments over time to better understand the public perceptions, concerns, and emotions that may influence the achievement of herd immunity goals. MethodsTweets were downloaded from a large-scale COVID-19 Twitter chatter data set from March 11, 2020, the day the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, to January 31, 2021. We used R software to clean the tweets and retain tweets that contained the keywords vaccination, vaccinations, vaccine, vaccines, immunization, vaccinate, and vaccinated. The final data set included in the analysis consisted of 1,499,421 unique tweets from 583,499 different users. We used R to perform latent Dirichlet allocation for topic modeling as well as sentiment and emotion analysis using the National Research Council of Canada Emotion Lexicon. ResultsTopic modeling of tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines yielded 16 topics, which were grouped into 5 overarching themes. Opinions about vaccination (227,840/1,499,421 tweets, 15.2%) was the most tweeted topic and remained a highly discussed topic during the majority of the period of our examination. Vaccine progress around the world became the most discussed topic around August 11, 2020, when Russia approved the world's first COVID-19 vaccine. With the advancement of vaccine administration, the topic of instruction on getting vaccines gradually became more salient and became the most discussed topic after the first week of January 2021. Weekly mean sentiment scores showed that despite fluctuations, the sentiment was increasingly positive in general. Emotion analysis further showed that trust was the most predominant emotion, followed by anticipation, fear, sadness, etc. The trust emotion reached its peak on November 9, 2020, when Pfizer announced that its vaccine is 90% effective. ConclusionsPublic COVID-19 vaccine-related discussion on Twitter was largely driven by major events about COVID-19 vaccines and mirrored the active news topics in mainstream media. The discussion also demonstrated a global perspective. The increasingly positive sentiment around COVID-19 vaccines and the dominant emotion of trust shown in the social media discussion may imply higher acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines compared with previous vaccines. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics 
690 |a R858-859.7 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol 23, Iss 6, p e24435 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.jmir.org/2021/6/e24435 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1438-8871 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a75fc4d6e1b34fbca42b42db0daac50b  |z Connect to this object online.