The Prevalance and Radiographic Evaluation of Mandibular Second Premolar Migration: A Retrospective Study

Purpose:To investigate the prevalence and radiographic characteristics of migrated mandibular second premolars byusing panoramic radiography.Materials amp; Methods:The previously taken 27758 panoramic radiographs were evaluated regarding the determining theprevalence of mandibular second premolar mi...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: İlhan Kaya (Συγγραφέας), Ayşegül Türkmenoğlu (Συγγραφέας), Halil Tolga Yüksel (Συγγραφέας)
Μορφή: Βιβλίο
Έκδοση: Ankara University, 2021-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:Connect to this object online.
Ετικέτες: Προσθήκη ετικέτας
Δεν υπάρχουν, Καταχωρήστε ετικέτα πρώτοι!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a7c58d309a0443a383194dbaeb73f588
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a İlhan Kaya  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ayşegül Türkmenoğlu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Halil Tolga Yüksel  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Prevalance and Radiographic Evaluation of Mandibular Second Premolar Migration: A Retrospective Study 
260 |b Ankara University,   |c 2021-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2757-6744 
500 |a 10.52037/eads.2021.0010 
520 |a Purpose:To investigate the prevalence and radiographic characteristics of migrated mandibular second premolars byusing panoramic radiography.Materials amp; Methods:The previously taken 27758 panoramic radiographs were evaluated regarding the determining theprevalence of mandibular second premolar migration. Thirty-six radiographs were excluded from the study due to notproviding the inclusion criteria. 27722 radiographs were evaluated retrospectively by the same operator. In the diagnosisof migrated teeth, radiographic features and demographic characteristics were recorded.Results:Nine migrated second premolar teeth were detected in the evaluation of all the radiographs (%0.03). The meanage of the cases was 37 years. All the migrated teeth were impacted, unilateral and the average distance between normaland migrated location was 41 mm. In most of migration case (in 6 case) absence of first permanent molar tooth wasobserved.Conclusion:It is concluded that, if the mandibular second premolar tooth are not located at physiologic position on thedental arch, a panoramic radiographic examination should be recommended to view all the jaws and related structures.Early detection of dental migration may be beneficial to prevent the possible further complications. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a impacted tooth 
690 |a migrated teeth 
690 |a panoramic radiograph 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n European Annals of Dental Sciences, Vol 48, Iss 2, Pp 64-68 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1685060 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2757-6744 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a7c58d309a0443a383194dbaeb73f588  |z Connect to this object online.