Hypercoagulable workup in a community hospital setting: to test or not to test; that is the question
Background: Thrombophilia tests are often ordered unnecessarily and/or inappropriately, with significant impact on healthcare costs, hospital resources, time, and potential harm to the patient. Objective: To identify the incidence of unnecessary and inappropriate thrombophilia testing in a community...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Greater Baltimore Medical Center,
2019-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_a816aecff0194a8c9b942c3dfb6d3f1d | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Ashish Gupta |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Poras Patel |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Raheel Anwar |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Diana Villanueva |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Viswanath Vasudevan |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Elizabeth Guevara |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Hypercoagulable workup in a community hospital setting: to test or not to test; that is the question |
260 | |b Greater Baltimore Medical Center, |c 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2000-9666 | ||
500 | |a 10.1080/20009666.2019.1655627 | ||
520 | |a Background: Thrombophilia tests are often ordered unnecessarily and/or inappropriately, with significant impact on healthcare costs, hospital resources, time, and potential harm to the patient. Objective: To identify the incidence of unnecessary and inappropriate thrombophilia testing in a community hospital setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records for patients who underwent inpatient thrombophilia testing at The Brooklyn Hospital Center from 1/1/2018 to 12/31/2018. The indications, and details of the tests, and associated costs were recorded. Results: A total of 62 patients were included (mean age 45.8, 67.7% female). In 57/62 (91.9%) patients, tests were ordered in the acute phase of thrombosis. At the time the tests were ordered, 29/62 (46.8%) patients were on anticoagulation. Positive results were found in 21/62 (53.2%) patients, but was repeated in only 1/21 (4.7%) patient. Results for 51/62 (82%) patients were obtained after discharge. The hematology-oncology service was consulted in 5/62 (8.1%) cases and recommended testing in only 1 (1.6%) patient. Only 1 (1.6%) patient had both an appropriate indication and appropriate testing. Costs for the 273 total tests were $26,400. Conclusion: Thrombophilia tests were often ordered inappropriately and unnecessarily. We recommend testing only for patients with inpatient status under recommendation from the hematology-oncology service. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a thrombophilia | ||
690 | |a venous thrombosis | ||
690 | |a hypercoagulability testing | ||
690 | |a Internal medicine | ||
690 | |a RC31-1245 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, Vol 9, Iss 5, Pp 392-396 (2019) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1655627 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2000-9666 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/a816aecff0194a8c9b942c3dfb6d3f1d |z Connect to this object online. |