COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Spain and associated factors

IntroductionThe present study explores the reasons of those who have not been vaccinated in the later stage of the vaccine rollout in Spain and its associated determinants.MethodsCluster and logistic regression analyses were used to assess differences in claimed reasons for vaccine hesitancy in Spai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Falcon (Author), Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez (Author), María Romay-Barja (Author), Alba Ayala (Author), Alfredo Burgos (Author), María José De Tena-Dávila (Author), Maria João Forjaz (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a93b46c1e8714809aca02b37c8fcb5fe
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Maria Falcon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a María Romay-Barja  |e author 
700 1 0 |a María Romay-Barja  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alba Ayala  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alba Ayala  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alfredo Burgos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a María José De Tena-Dávila  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maria João Forjaz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maria João Forjaz  |e author 
245 0 0 |a COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Spain and associated factors 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129079 
520 |a IntroductionThe present study explores the reasons of those who have not been vaccinated in the later stage of the vaccine rollout in Spain and its associated determinants.MethodsCluster and logistic regression analyses were used to assess differences in claimed reasons for vaccine hesitancy in Spain using two samples of unvaccinated people (18-40 years old) gathered by an online cross-sectional survey from social networks (n = 910) and from a representative panel (n = 963) in October-November 2021.ResultsThe main reasons for not being vaccinated were believing that the COVID-19 vaccines had been developed too fast, they were experimental, and they were not safe, endorsed by 68.7% participants in the social network sample and 55.4% in the panel sample. The cluster analysis classified the participants into two groups. Logistic regression showed that Cluster 2 (individuals who reported structural constraints and health-related reasons such as pregnancy or medical recommendation) presented a lower trust in information from health professionals, had a lower willingness to get vaccinated in the future, and avoided less social/family events than those in Cluster 1 (reasons centered in distrust on COVID-19 vaccines, conspiracy thoughts and complacency).ConclusionsIt is important to promote information campaigns that provide reliable information and fight fake news and myths. Future vaccination intention differs in both clusters, so these results are important for developing strategies target to increase vaccination uptake for those who do not reject the COVID-19 vaccine completely. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a COVID-19 
690 |a vaccine 
690 |a hesitancy 
690 |a public health 
690 |a behavioral insights 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 11 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129079/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a93b46c1e8714809aca02b37c8fcb5fe  |z Connect to this object online.