A Reply to Comment on Kluckow M. Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4
The commentary provided by Gentles et al. argues for the implementation of a universal pulse oximetry screening program, and I agree that, if it is possible, this is the optimum way to introduce this important health care measure for all of the reasons set out by the authors.[...]
Saved in:
Main Author: | Martin Kluckow (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
MDPI AG,
2018-04-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comment on Kluckow M. Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4
by: Thomas L. Gentles, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective
by: Martin Kluckow
Published: (2018) -
Newborn pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects
by: Sophie Jullien
Published: (2021) -
Consumer Satisfaction with Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening in a Midwifery-Led Maternity Setting
by: Elza Cloete, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination and Pulse Oximetry for Critical Congenital Cardiac Disease Screening in Newborns
by: Jari T. van Vliet, et al.
Published: (2023)