The effects of an abrupt increase in taxes on candy and soda in Norway: an observational study of retail sales

Abstract Background Fiscal policies are used to promote a healthier diet; however, there is still a call for real-world evaluations of taxes on unhealthy foods and beverages. We aimed to evaluate the effect of an abrupt increase, of respectively 80 and 40%, in the excising Norwegian taxes on candy a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bente Øvrebø (Author), Torleif B. Halkjelsvik (Author), Jørgen R. Meisfjord (Author), Elling Bere (Author), Rannveig K. Hart (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_aa73b0c78371490a9a3a3b8b2831a3fe
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bente Øvrebø  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Torleif B. Halkjelsvik  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jørgen R. Meisfjord  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elling Bere  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rannveig K. Hart  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The effects of an abrupt increase in taxes on candy and soda in Norway: an observational study of retail sales 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12966-020-01017-3 
500 |a 1479-5868 
520 |a Abstract Background Fiscal policies are used to promote a healthier diet; however, there is still a call for real-world evaluations of taxes on unhealthy foods and beverages. We aimed to evaluate the effect of an abrupt increase, of respectively 80 and 40%, in the excising Norwegian taxes on candy and beverages on volume sales of candy and soda. We expected sales to fall. Methods We analyzed electronic point of sale data covering approximately 98% of volume sales of grocery stores in Norway. In two pre-registered models with weekly (log-)sales of taxed candy and soda from 3884 individual stores, we modeled the difference between the jump (discontinuity) in the trend around the time of the increase in taxes and the corresponding jump in the trend in a control season from the previous years (Model 1). In addition, we modeled the difference between the intervention and the control season in their changes in average sales (Model 2). Results Model 1 showed a 6.1% (one-sided 95% CI: not applicable (NA), 23.4, p-value = 0.26) increase and a − 3.9% (95% CI: NA, 4.9, p-value = 0.23) reduction in the differences in the jump in the trends, for candy and soda, respectively. The second model showed a relative decrease of − 4.9% (95% CI: NA, 1.0, p-value = 0.08) in the average sales of candy and an increase of 1.5% (95% CI: NA, 5.0, p-value = 0.24) in sales of soda. Supplementary analyses suggested that the results were sensitive to clustering on the time dimension. Conclusions When using two different quasi-experimental designs to model changes in volume sales of taxed candy and soda, we were not able to detect reductions in sales that coincided with an increase in the taxes. Variation across time makes it difficult to detect potentially small changes in sales even when using an entire country's worth of sales data on the level of individual stores. We speculate that the tax increases were too modest to affect the prices to alter sales sufficiently. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public health tax 
690 |a Sugary drink tax 
690 |a SSB-tax 
690 |a Retail sales 
690 |a Sin tax 
690 |a Quasi-experiment 
690 |a Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases 
690 |a RC620-627 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-020-01017-3 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1479-5868 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/aa73b0c78371490a9a3a3b8b2831a3fe  |z Connect to this object online.