Evaluating scenarios for school reopening under COVID19

Abstract Background Thousands of school systems have struggled with the decisions about how to deliver education safely and effectively amid the COVID19 pandemic. This study evaluates the public health impact of various school reopening scenarios (when, and how to return to in-person instruction) on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arden Baxter (Author), Buse Eylul Oruc (Author), John Asplund (Author), Pinar Keskinocak (Author), Nicoleta Serban (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ab49e79ee50f4f859dabba1551a76e47
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Arden Baxter  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Buse Eylul Oruc  |e author 
700 1 0 |a John Asplund  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pinar Keskinocak  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nicoleta Serban  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluating scenarios for school reopening under COVID19 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12889-022-12910-w 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a Abstract Background Thousands of school systems have struggled with the decisions about how to deliver education safely and effectively amid the COVID19 pandemic. This study evaluates the public health impact of various school reopening scenarios (when, and how to return to in-person instruction) on the spread of COVID19. Methods An agent-based simulation model was adapted and used to project the impact of various school reopening strategies on the number of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths in the state of Georgia during the study period, i.e., February 18th-November 24th, 2020. The tested strategies include (i) schools closed, i.e., all students receive online instruction, (ii) alternating school day, i.e., half of the students receive in-person instruction on Mondays and Wednesdays and the other half on Tuesdays and Thursdays, (iii) alternating school day for children, i.e., half of the children (ages 0-9) receive in-person instruction on Mondays and Wednesdays and the other half on Tuesdays and Thursdays, (iv) children only, i.e., only children receive in-person instruction, (v) regular, i.e., all students return to in-person instruction. We also tested the impact of universal masking in schools. Results Across all scenarios, the number of COVID19-related deaths ranged from approximately 8.8 to 9.9 thousand, the number of cumulative infections ranged from 1.76 to 1.96 million for adults and 625 to 771 thousand for children and youth, and the number of COVID19-related hospitalizations ranged from approximately 71 to 80 thousand during the study period. Compared to schools reopening August 10 with a regular reopening strategy, the percentage of the population infected reduced by 13%, 11%, 9%, and 6% in the schools closed, alternating school day for children, children only, and alternating school day reopening strategies, respectively. Universal masking in schools for all students further reduced outcome measures. Conclusions Reopening schools following a regular reopening strategy would lead to higher deaths, hospitalizations, and infections. Hybrid in-person and online reopening strategies, especially if offered as an option to families and teachers who prefer to opt-in, provide a good balance in reducing the infection spread compared to the regular reopening strategy, while ensuring access to in-person education. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a COVID19 
690 |a Pandemic 
690 |a Public health 
690 |a School reopening 
690 |a Non-pharmaceutical interventions 
690 |a Agent-based disease modeling 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12910-w 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ab49e79ee50f4f859dabba1551a76e47  |z Connect to this object online.