Screening for motor dysgraphia in public schools

Objective: To screen for warning signs of dysgraphia in schoolchildren at the sixth grade of elementary school. Method: This was a descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional cohort study performed with 630 schoolchildren assessed through the (adapted) Analytical Dysgraphia Inventory, which recognizes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marielza Regina Ismael Martins (Author), José Alexandre Bastos (Author), Angela Traldi Cecato (Author), Maria de Lourdes Souza Araujo (Author), Rafael Ribeiro Magro (Author), Vinicios Alaminos (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Brazilian Society of Pediatrics, 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ab8a17db95a04d09a1a94f0d19b8d48a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Marielza Regina Ismael Martins  |e author 
700 1 0 |a José Alexandre Bastos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Angela Traldi Cecato  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maria de Lourdes Souza Araujo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rafael Ribeiro Magro  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vinicios Alaminos  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Screening for motor dysgraphia in public schools 
260 |b Brazilian Society of Pediatrics,   |c 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2255-5536 
500 |a 10.1016/j.jpedp.2012.08.008 
520 |a Objective: To screen for warning signs of dysgraphia in schoolchildren at the sixth grade of elementary school. Method: This was a descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional cohort study performed with 630 schoolchildren assessed through the (adapted) Analytical Dysgraphia Inventory, which recognizes difficulties in writing through the tracing the graphics. Results: A total of 22% (n = 138) of the sample presented all indications of dysgraphia; the most prevalent indicator was ascending/descending/fluctuating lines (53.6%). When the indicators were correlated to gender, males showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in most of them. Among the warning signs of co-occurrences, dyslexia was the most prevalent indicator (22%). Conclusion: Given the large number of warning signs of dysgraphia observed in schoolchildren, it is advisable to screen for these signs, in order to implement early interventions. 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Screening 
690 |a Dysgraphia 
690 |a Learning disorders 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a RJ1-570 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português), Vol 89, Iss 1, Pp 70-74 (2013) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255553613000128 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2255-5536 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ab8a17db95a04d09a1a94f0d19b8d48a  |z Connect to this object online.