Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Radiographs Using Clinically Relevant Parameters
This work compared the assessment of clinically relevant parameters by two-dimensional, that is, full-mouth intraoral radiograph (I-O) and panoramic radiograph (OPT), and three-dimensional, that is, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), imaging methods. Different radiographic images (CBCT, I-O and O...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Julia C. Schmidt (Author), Claudia-Julie Gutekunst (Author), Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt (Author), Patrick R. Schmidlin (Author), Clemens Walter (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
MDPI AG,
2019-05-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Femoroacetabular Impingement Measurements Obtained From Two-Dimensional Radiographs Versus Three-Dimensional-Reconstructed Computed Tomography Images Result in Different Values
by: David M. Falgout, M.D, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Two-Dimensional Radiographic Diagnosis of Maxillary Canine Impactions
by: Alin M. Iacob, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Evaluations of Cranial Asymmetry in Deformational Plagiocephaly Using a Three-Dimensional Scanner
by: Risa Kato, et al.
Published: (2022) -
KINEMATIC OF THE TAKEOFF PHASE OF THE LONG JUMP: A COMPARISON OF TWO DIMENSIONAL AND THREE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSES
by: Ahmet Alptekin, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Bladder Volume Determination: Two-dimensional Versus Three-dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound
by: Ching-Chung Liang, et al.
Published: (2009)