EFFICACY OF PROTAPER NEXT AND PROTAPER UNIVERSAL RETREATMENT SYSTEMS IN REMOVING GUTTA-PERCHA IN CURVED ROOT CANALS DURING ROOT CANAL RETREATMENT

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the cleanliness of root canal walls after retreatment using ProTaper Next (PTN), ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTR) nickel-titanium (NiTi) systems and Hedström hand files in curved mesial canals of mandibular molar teeth and the time required for gutt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taha ÖZYÜREK (Author), Ebru ÖZSEZER-DEMİRYÜREK (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Istanbul University, 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ac1b534810f14fca8cc4850d23ec1a02
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Taha ÖZYÜREK  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ebru ÖZSEZER-DEMİRYÜREK  |e author 
245 0 0 |a EFFICACY OF PROTAPER NEXT AND PROTAPER UNIVERSAL RETREATMENT SYSTEMS IN REMOVING GUTTA-PERCHA IN CURVED ROOT CANALS DURING ROOT CANAL RETREATMENT 
260 |b Istanbul University,   |c 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.17096/jiufd.97431 
500 |a 2149-2352 
500 |a 2149-4592 
520 |a Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the cleanliness of root canal walls after retreatment using ProTaper Next (PTN), ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTR) nickel-titanium (NiTi) systems and Hedström hand files in curved mesial canals of mandibular molar teeth and the time required for gutta-percha and sealer removal. Materials and Methods: Ninety mandibular molar teeth with curved mesial roots were instrumented up to #35.04 with Mtwo NiTi rotary instruments and obturated using the continuous wave of condensation technique. Removal of gutta-percha and sealer was performed using one of the following: PTN and PTR NiTi systems and Hedström hand files. Samples were placed on the VistaScan phosphor plates in the mesio-distal direction and the radiographs were taken. The digital radiographs were analyzed using AutoCAD software. Also, the total time required for gutta-percha removal was calculated by a chronometer. Results: The total retreatment time was significantly shorter in the PTN and PTR groups compared with the manual group (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the groups according to the total residual gutta-percha and sealer (p<0.05). The PTN and PTR groups left significantly less gutta-percha and sealer remnant than the manual group (p<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the PTN and PTR groups showed less residual gutta-percha and sealer than the manual group. The NiTi rotary systems were significantly faster than the manual group in the time required for gutta-percha and sealer removal. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a ProTaper Next 
690 |a ProTaper Universal 
690 |a retreatment 
690 |a curved Canals 
690 |a endodontics 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Vol 51, Iss 2, Pp 7-13 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://www.journals.istanbul.edu.tr/iudis/article/view/5000191433/5000181102 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2149-2352 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2149-4592 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ac1b534810f14fca8cc4850d23ec1a02  |z Connect to this object online.