Forensic Pathology Education in Pathology Residency

Forensic pathology is a fundamental part of anatomic pathology training during pathology residency. However, the lack of information on forensic teaching suggests the highly variable nature of forensic education. A survey of pathology residency program directors was performed to determine key aspect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Spencer DO (Author), Wayne K. Ross MD (Author), Ronald E. Domen MD (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2017-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ac30182d94664f79acabf50f550d3e0a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Amanda Spencer DO  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wayne K. Ross MD  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ronald E. Domen MD  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Forensic Pathology Education in Pathology Residency 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2017-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2374-2895 
500 |a 10.1177/2374289517719503 
520 |a Forensic pathology is a fundamental part of anatomic pathology training during pathology residency. However, the lack of information on forensic teaching suggests the highly variable nature of forensic education. A survey of pathology residency program directors was performed to determine key aspects of their respective forensic rotations and curriculum. A total of 38.3% of programs from across the country responded, and the survey results show 5.6% don't require a forensic pathology rotation. In those that do, most forensic pathology rotations are 4 weeks long, are done at a medical examiner's office, and require set prerequisites. A total of 21.1% of responding programs have residents who are not receiving documented evaluations for this rotation. While 39.6% of programs have a defined forensics curriculum, as many as 15% do not. Furthermore, nearly 43% of programs place no limit on counting forensic autopsies when applying for pathology board examinations. Our survey confirmed the inconsistent nature of forensic pathology training in resident education. Additionally, our curriculum was reorganized to create a more robust educational experience. A pre- and post-forensic lecture quiz and Resident In-Service Examination scores were analyzed to determine our curriculum's impact and effectiveness. Analysis of our pre- and post-lecture quiz showed an improved overall average as well as an increase in Resident In-Service Examination scores, indicating improved general forensic pathology knowledge. Using this knowledge, along with changes in our curriculum, we generated a number of recommendations for improving forensic pathology education in pathology residency. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Pathology 
690 |a RB1-214 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Academic Pathology, Vol 4 (2017) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289517719503 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2374-2895 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ac30182d94664f79acabf50f550d3e0a  |z Connect to this object online.