Competing and contested discourses of citizenship and civic praxis

In this paper, I utilize complementary features of critical discourse analysis (CDA) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to trace and investigate issues of power, materiality, and reproduction embedded within notions of citizenship and civic engagement. I interrogate the often narrow and conservative pol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jill Koyama (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Arizona State University, 2017-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ac58d8cfb7f743ccba9e43f7c49f9b47
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jill Koyama  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Competing and contested discourses of citizenship and civic praxis 
260 |b Arizona State University,   |c 2017-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1068-2341 
500 |a 10.14507/epaa.25.2730 
520 |a In this paper, I utilize complementary features of critical discourse analysis (CDA) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to trace and investigate issues of power, materiality, and reproduction embedded within notions of citizenship and civic engagement. I interrogate the often narrow and conservative political and public discourses in Arizona, as well as the xenophobic-driven civics education policy. To these, I juxtapose the enactment of citizenship by youth who use, produce, and share language materials and counter authoritative citizenship and civic discourses, especially, but not exclusively, in online contexts.  I explore the questions: In what ways are discourses of civic engagement and citizenship assembled, interpreted, understood, enacted, and contested in Arizona? What are the relationships between the civics education policy, discursive enactments of citizenship, and the youth of Mexican descent's online civic practices? I draw on a mixture of textual (language materials) and discursive (events, acts, and practices) data collected in Arizona to argue that youth are doing critical, yet unrecognized and undervalued, forms of civic engagement online, which could be incorporated in the formal civics education curriculum. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a citizenship 
690 |a civics education 
690 |a critical discourse analysis 
690 |a youth 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 25, Iss 0 (2017) 
787 0 |n https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2730 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ac58d8cfb7f743ccba9e43f7c49f9b47  |z Connect to this object online.