Investigation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing using a dynamic leg press and comparison with a cycle ergometer

Abstract Background Leg-press machines are widely employed for musculoskeletal conditioning of the lower-limbs and they provide cardiovascular benefits for resistance training in cardiac patients. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a dynamic leg press (DLP) for incremental cardio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farouk Chrif (Author), Tobias Nef (Author), Kenneth J. Hunt (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2018-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ac58e56bc04b422b8f5a60e233669081
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Farouk Chrif  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tobias Nef  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kenneth J. Hunt  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Investigation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing using a dynamic leg press and comparison with a cycle ergometer 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2018-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s13102-018-0095-3 
500 |a 2052-1847 
520 |a Abstract Background Leg-press machines are widely employed for musculoskeletal conditioning of the lower-limbs and they provide cardiovascular benefits for resistance training in cardiac patients. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a dynamic leg press (DLP) for incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and to compare the results with those obtained using a cycle ergometer (CE). Methods Twelve healthy participants aged 27±4 years (mean ± standard deviation) performed incremental cardiopulmonary exercise tests on a DLP and on a CE. To facilitate CPET, the DLP was augmented with force and angle sensors, a work rate estimation algorithm, and a visual feedback system. Gas exchange variables and heart rate were recorded breath-by-breath using a cardiopulmonary monitoring system. Results Peak oxygen uptake and peak heart rate were significantly lower for the DLP than for the CE: peak oxygen uptake was 3.2±0.5 vs. 4.1±0.5 L/min (DLP vs. CE, p=6.7×10−6); peak heart rate was 174±14 vs. 182±13 bpm (DLP vs. CE, p=0.0016). Likewise, the sub-maximal cardiopulmonary parameters, viz. the first and second ventilatory thresholds, and ramp duration were significantly lower for the DLP. Conclusions The dynamic leg press was found to be feasible for CPET: the approach was technically implementable and all peak and sub-maximal cardiopulmonary parameters were able to be identified. The lower outcome values observed with the DLP can be attributed to a peripheral factor, namely the earlier onset of muscular fatigue. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cardiopulmonary exercise testing 
690 |a Dynamic leg press 
690 |a Cycle ergometer 
690 |a Oxygen uptake 
690 |a Heart rate 
690 |a Ventilatory threshold 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13102-018-0095-3 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2052-1847 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ac58e56bc04b422b8f5a60e233669081  |z Connect to this object online.