'Metal to resin': A comparative evaluation of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children

Aims: To compare the clinical efficacy of two space maintainers namely, conventional band and loop and Fiber Reinforced Composite Resin (FRCR) space maintainers . Subjects and Methods: Thirty healthy children, aged 5 to 8 years were selected having at least two deciduous molars in different quadrant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A Garg (Author), F Samadi (Author), J N Jaiswal (Author), S Saha (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ac5a4ceb5d6b4d77a9921cba2e279a95
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a A Garg  |e author 
700 1 0 |a F Samadi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a J N Jaiswal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a S Saha  |e author 
245 0 0 |a 'Metal to resin': A comparative evaluation of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0970-4388 
500 |a 1998-3905 
500 |a 10.4103/0970-4388.130783 
520 |a Aims: To compare the clinical efficacy of two space maintainers namely, conventional band and loop and Fiber Reinforced Composite Resin (FRCR) space maintainers . Subjects and Methods: Thirty healthy children, aged 5 to 8 years were selected having at least two deciduous molars in different quadrants indicated for extraction or lost previously. FRCR space maintainer was placed in one quadrant and in the other quadrant band and loop space maintainer was cemented. All the patients were recalled at 1 st , 3 rd , and 6 th months for evaluation of both types of space maintainer. Patient acceptability, time taken, and clinical efficacy was recorded. Statistical analysis used: The observations thus obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using Chi- square test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Patient acceptability was greater in Group I (FRCR) in comparison to Group II (band and loop space maintainer). The time taken by Group I was significantly lower as compared to that of Group II. In Group I, debonding of enamel, composite was the most common complication leading to failure followed by debonding of fiber composite. In Group II, cement loss was the most common complication leading to failure followed by slippage of band and fracture of loop. The success rates of Groups I and Group II weares 63.3% and 36.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The study concluded that FRCRFiber Reinforced Composite Resin (Ribbond) space maintainers can be considered as viable alternative to the conventional band and loop space maintainers. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Band and loop 
690 |a fiber reinforced composite resin 
690 |a space loss 
690 |a space maintainer 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Vol 32, Iss 2, Pp 111-116 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2014;volume=32;issue=2;spage=111;epage=116;aulast=Garg 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0970-4388 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3905 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ac5a4ceb5d6b4d77a9921cba2e279a95  |z Connect to this object online.