Slika na naslovnici

A comparative evaluation of microleakage between resin-modified glass ionomer, flowable composite, and cention-N in Class V restorations: A confocal laser scanning microscope study

Background: Microleakage is a concern while restoring cervical lesions. Many products have attempted to minimize the interfacial gap between the tooth and restoration, the main pathway of microleakage. Aims and Objective: To compare and evaluate the microleakage in Class V cavity restored with nanoh...

Shranjeno v:

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors:	Krishnan Venugopal (Author), L Krishnaprasad (Author), V P Prabath Singh (Author), Arjun B Ravi (Author), Kaushik Haridas (Author), Drisya Soman (Author)
Format:	Knjiga
Izdano:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Teme:	article
Online dostop:	Connect to this object online.
Oznake:	Označite Brez oznak, prvi označite!

Podobne knjige/članki

Comparing marginal microleakage in Class V cavities restored with flowable composite and Cention-N using confocal microscope-an in-vitro study
od: Pratima R Shenoi, et al.
Izdano: (2021)

Effect of Mechanical Load Cycling on Class V Glass-Ionomer and Composite Restorations; A Microleakage and Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation
od: Esmaeil Yassini, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

In vivo evaluation of clinical performance of Cention N and glass ionomer cement in proximal restorations of primary molars
od: Divya Arora, et al.
Izdano: (2022)

Effect of Mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage of Restorative Glass Ionomers Compared to Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities
od: Zahra Hasani, et al.
Izdano: (2019)

Microleakage of glass ionomer cement restorations
od: Davidović Lado, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An in vitro study
od: Paromita Mazumdar, et al.
Izdano: (2019)

Effect of silver diamine fluoride on the microleakage of flowable resin composite and glass ionomer cement restorations to carious primary dentin: an-in vitro study
od: Sarah Osama, et al.
Izdano: (2024)

The differences of microleakage smart dentin replacement, glass ionomer cement and a flowable resin composite as orifice barrier in root canal treated
od: Erma Sofiani, et al.
Izdano: (2022)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage in conventional glass ionomer cements and triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements
od: Rani Somani, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations
od: Maryam Mofidi, et al.
Izdano: (2022)

Comparison of antibacterial activity and fluoride release in tooth-colored restorative materials: Resin-modified glass ionomer, zirconomer, giomer, and cention N
od: Atiyeh Feiz, et al.
Izdano: (2022)

Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Primary Dentin
od: Kiana Poorzandpoush, et al.
Izdano: (2019)

Phytic acid: A novel dentine conditioning agent for glass ionomer cement restorations: An In Vitro scanning electron microscopic study
od: D P Souparnika, et al.
Izdano: (2023)

The effect of powder/liquid ratio on microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer
od: Sepide Ostadi Joybari, et al.
Izdano: (2017)

Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer®: A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement
od: Rawan Albeshti, et al.
Izdano: (2018)

Microleakage of conventional, resin-modified, and nano-ionomer glass ionomer cement as primary teeth filling material
od: Dita Madyarani, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An In vitro study
od: Arthilakshmi, et al.
Izdano: (2018)

Surface micromorphological changes of glass ionomer following application of 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride: A scanning electron microscope study
od: Ektah Khosla, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

The Effect of Different Surface Treatments on The Shear Bond Strength Between Flowable Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement
od: Manaf B. Ahmed
Izdano: (2023)

The effect of mechanical load cycling and polishing time on microleakage of class V glass-ionomer and composite restorations: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation
od: Mansoreh Mirzaie, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Microleakage of an Enhanced Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Material in Primary Molars
od: Baharan Ranjbar Omidi, et al.
Izdano: (2018)

Effect of acid etching of glass ionomer cement surface on the microleakage of sandwich restorations
od: Álvaro Della Bona, et al.
Izdano: (2007)

Evaluation of the Effect of Nanographene Oxide on Microleakage of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
od: Farahnaz Sharafeddin, et al.
Izdano: (2023)

Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement and compomer: An in vitro study
od: C Vishnu Rekha, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer
od: Mansore Mirzaie, et al.
Izdano: (2016)

A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer
od: Maryam Khoroushi, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Transmission of composite polymerization contraction force through a flowable composite and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement
od: Juan Carlos Castañeda-Espinosa, et al.
Izdano: (2007)

Microscopic evaluation of rotatory and handle caries removal on glass ionomer cement/dentin interface
od: Silvio José Mauro, et al.
Izdano: (2018)

COVID-19 antibody tests: An overview
od: Arjun B Ravi, et al.
Izdano: (2021)

Scanning electron microscopy analysis of adhesive bond of glass-ionomer cement restorations
od: Davidović Lado, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

An Evaluation on the Effects of Flowable or Condensable Composites Application on Microleakage
od: N Mohammadi, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

Microleakage of Flowable Composite as Class I Restorative Materials
od: Makdad Chakmakchi, et al.
Izdano: (2022)

Effect of flowable composite on microleakage of condensable composite restorations
od: Pahlavan A., et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Evaluation of marginal adaptation of a self-adhering flowable composite resin liner: A scanning electron microscopic study
od: Chava Gayatri, et al.
Izdano: (2018)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage of conventional and modifications of glass ionomer cement in primary teeth: An in vitro study
od: A S Shruthi, et al.
Izdano: (2015)

Comparative evaluation of the microleakage of two modified glass ionomer cements on primary molars. An in vivo study
od: Shaila Masih, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Microleakage patterns of glass ionomer cement at cement-band and cement-enamel interfaces in primary teeth
od: P Shankar, et al.
Izdano: (2020)

The effect of different irrigants on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules with and without activation, using confocal scanning microscope
od: Helayl A Alshaibani, et al.
Izdano: (2022)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage in Class V cavities restored with giomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, zirconomer and nano-ionomer: An In vitro study
od: K Mohammed Salman, et al.
Izdano: (2019)

Comparison of Coronal Microleakage of Canals Filled with Gutta Percha and Resilon with a Glass Ionomer Coronal Barrier
od: Ali reza Kolahduzan, et al.
Izdano: (2014)