Evaluating the Implementation of a Pilot Quality Improvement Program to Support Appropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing in General Practice

Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing contributes to increasing antimicrobial resistance. An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program in the form of quality improvement activities that included audit and feedback, clinical decision support and education was developed to help optimise prescribing in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruby Biezen (Author), Kirsty Buising (Author), Tim Monaghan (Author), Rachael Ball (Author), Karin Thursky (Author), Ron Cheah (Author), Malcolm Clark (Author), Jo-Anne (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_acf0d1e34cde4241a8f6716f25ac49c5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ruby Biezen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kirsty Buising  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tim Monaghan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rachael Ball  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karin Thursky  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ron Cheah  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Malcolm Clark  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jo-Anne   |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluating the Implementation of a Pilot Quality Improvement Program to Support Appropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing in General Practice 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/antibiotics10070867 
500 |a 2079-6382 
520 |a Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing contributes to increasing antimicrobial resistance. An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program in the form of quality improvement activities that included audit and feedback, clinical decision support and education was developed to help optimise prescribing in general practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of this program (Guidance GP) in three general practices in Melbourne, Australia, between November 2019 and August 2020. Thirty-one general practitioners (GPs) participated in the program, with 11 GPs and three practice managers participating in follow-up focus groups and interviews to explore the acceptability and feasibility of the program. Our findings showed that the quality improvement activities were acceptable to GPs, if they accurately fit GPs' decision-making process and workflow. It was also important that they provided clinically meaningful information in the form of audit and feedback to GPs. The time needed to coordinate the program, and costs to implement the program were some of the potential barriers identified. Facilitators of success were a "whole of practice" approach with enthusiastic GPs and practice staff, and an identified practice champion. The findings of this research will inform implementation strategies for both the Guidance GP program and AMS programs more broadly in Australian general practice, which will be critical for general practice participation and engagement. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a antibiotics 
690 |a antimicrobial stewardship 
690 |a audit and feedback 
690 |a general practice 
690 |a general practitioner 
690 |a inappropriate prescribing 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Antibiotics, Vol 10, Iss 7, p 867 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/7/867 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/acf0d1e34cde4241a8f6716f25ac49c5  |z Connect to this object online.