Effects of match situational variables on possession: The case of England Premier League season 2015/16

ABSTRACT Aim The main aim of this study was to identify the effects of match location, quality of opponents and match status on possession during the 2015/16 Season of England Premier League. Methods Three hundred and eighty matches played by 20 teams were analysed. For each match, two values were r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo Aquino (Author), João P. V. Manechini (Author), Bruno L. S. Bedo (Author), Enrico F. Puggina (Author), Júlio Garganta (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ad2fad74656d47b79c2b9e9848a07dbd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rodrigo Aquino  |e author 
700 1 0 |a João P. V. Manechini  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bruno L. S. Bedo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Enrico F. Puggina  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Júlio Garganta  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effects of match situational variables on possession: The case of England Premier League season 2015/16 
260 |b Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP),   |c 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1980-6574 
500 |a 10.1590/s1980-6574201700030015 
520 |a ABSTRACT Aim The main aim of this study was to identify the effects of match location, quality of opponents and match status on possession during the 2015/16 Season of England Premier League. Methods Three hundred and eighty matches played by 20 teams were analysed. For each match, two values were recorded, resulting in 760 observations. Results Teams who played at home (51.77 ± 10.22%) presented higher possession values (EF=moderate) than those who played away (48.21 ± 10.30%). Quality of opponents also had a significant difference, as possession was higher (EF=large) when teams played against weak (52.30 ± 9.77%) than strong opponents (46.48 ± 10.38%). The multivariate analysis revealed no interaction between situational variables and possession (p = 0.76). Despite the teams classified as "best-ranking" (1st to 8th position: 50.60 ± 10.35%) presented greater possession (EF=moderate) than "worst-ranking" (9st to 20th position: 47.59 ± 9.74%), no significant differences were found in the comparisons of match status (winner [50.34 ± 10.48%] x drawer [49.95 ± 10.25%] x loser [49.68 ± 10.48%]). Conclusion General interpretations should be viewed with caution, since this possession can represent an indicator of success for a team but not for others. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a football association 
690 |a performance indicator 
690 |a situational variables 
690 |a match analysis 
690 |a elite soccer 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Motriz: Revista de Educacao Fisica, Vol 23, Iss 3 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742017000300323&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1980-6574 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ad2fad74656d47b79c2b9e9848a07dbd  |z Connect to this object online.