Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players

ABSTRACTResearch related to arm bone density of badminton players focused mainly on humerus, how much forearm exposed to physical load is affected by this stress has been studies less. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate mineral density of dominant and non-dominant forearm bone mineral de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mustafa Şakir Akgül (Author), Arzu Altunel (Author), Veli Volkan Gürses (Author), Bilgehan Baydil (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Selcuk University, 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ad43b4e3eaa641be9e5fdfd23ef8df69
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mustafa Şakir Akgül  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Arzu Altunel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Veli Volkan Gürses  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bilgehan Baydil  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players 
260 |b Selcuk University,   |c 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2147-5652 
500 |a 10.15314/tsed.587100 
520 |a ABSTRACTResearch related to arm bone density of badminton players focused mainly on humerus, how much forearm exposed to physical load is affected by this stress has been studies less. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate mineral density of dominant and non-dominant forearm bone mineral density of badminton players who have been regularly playing badminton for 10 years. 12 male badminton players whose dominant arms were the same voluntarily participated in this study. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the players was evaluated with Dual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA). Data was evaluated with SPSS 23. Controlled research method was used to estimate BMD of the players. Differences between dominant and non-dominant arms were assessed with a non-parametric test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. P value was set at p lt;0.05. Significant difference was found between BMD of dominant right ultra-distal part and BMD of non-dominant left ultra-distal part (z:-2,94, sig:0,00) and between BMD of dominant right proximal part and BMD of  non-dominant left proximal part (z:-2,09, sig:0,03). There was no significant difference between dominant proximal 1/3 part and non-dominant proximal 1/3 part (z:1,85, sig:0,06). As a result, long-term badminton training has positive effects on BMD. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a badminton 
690 |a bone mineral density 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Vol 21, Iss 2, Pp 337-340 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/811064 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2147-5652 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ad43b4e3eaa641be9e5fdfd23ef8df69  |z Connect to this object online.