Automated Measures of Lexical Sophistication: Predicting Proficiency in an Integrated Academic Writing Task

Background. Advances in automated analyses of written discourse have made available a wide range of indices that can be used to better understand linguistic features present in language users' discourse and the relationships these metrics hold with human raters' assessments of writing. Pur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Randy Appel (Author), Angel Arias (Author)
Format: Book
Published: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_add48991578b4fd1a737ba788f70285d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Randy Appel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Angel Arias  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Automated Measures of Lexical Sophistication: Predicting Proficiency in an Integrated Academic Writing Task 
260 |b National Research University Higher School of Economics,   |c 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.17323/jle.2023.11045 
500 |a 2411-7390 
520 |a Background. Advances in automated analyses of written discourse have made available a wide range of indices that can be used to better understand linguistic features present in language users' discourse and the relationships these metrics hold with human raters' assessments of writing. Purpose. The present study extends previous research in this area by using the TAALES 2.2 software application to automatically extract 484 single and multi-word metrics of lexical sophistication to examine their relationship with differences in assessed L2 English writing proficiency. Methods. Using a graded corpus of timed, integrated essays from a major academic English language test, correlations and multiple regressions were used to identify specific metrics that best predict L2 English writing proficiency scores. Results. The most parsimonious regression model yielded four-predictor variables, with total word count, orthographic neighborhood frequency, lexical decision time, and word naming response time accounting for 36% of total explained variance. Implications. Results emphasize the importance of writing fluency (by way of total word count) in assessments of this kind. Thus, learners looking to improve writing proficiency may find benefit from writing activities aimed at increasing speed of production. Furthermore, despite a substantial amount of variance explained by the final regression model, findings suggest the need for a wider range of metrics that tap into additional aspects of writing proficiency. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a second language writing 
690 |a automated analysis 
690 |a corpus 
690 |a integrated writing 
690 |a L2 English 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Philology. Linguistics 
690 |a P1-1091 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Language and Education, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/11045 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2411-7390 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/add48991578b4fd1a737ba788f70285d  |z Connect to this object online.