Standards for Quality of Supervisors of Examiners Selecting for Masters Thesis in Education Faculties of Gazza Universities from Their Points of View

Abstract The present study aimed at identifying quality standards in the selection of supervisors and examiners for theses in colleges of education in the Palestinian universities in the Gaza Strip from their point of view. The study sample consisted of (68) supervisors and the teaching staff of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammad Ibrahim (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of Science and Technology, Yemen, 2013-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ae274f2fb5cf4c608974c8dc6bf59a01
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mohammad Ibrahim  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Standards for Quality of Supervisors of Examiners Selecting for Masters Thesis in Education Faculties of Gazza Universities from Their Points of View 
260 |b University of Science and Technology, Yemen,   |c 2013-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2308-5347 
500 |a 2308-5355 
500 |a 10.20428/ajqahe.v6i0.758 
520 |a Abstract The present study aimed at identifying quality standards in the selection of supervisors and examiners for theses in colleges of education in the Palestinian universities in the Gaza Strip from their point of view. The study sample consisted of (68) supervisors and the teaching staff of the Palestinian universities in the Gaza Strip. A list of criteria is prepared consisting of ( 24) items distributed on four areas: supervisor and his  educational qualifications, examiners and their educational qualifications, panels of discussion and reviewing and the role of Graduate Studies in the supervision of theses. The results showed that the area of the formation of panels of discussion and reviewing came in first place with a percentage of (69.95), the field of the supervisor and his educational qualifications came in the second place with a percentage of (69.33), of the role of graduate studies in the supervision of the theses came in third place with a percentage of (69.31),and, then,examiners and their educational qualificationscame in the finalrank with a percentage of   (66.53). The  results of the study showed that there were no differences of  statistical significance s (0.05) in the degree of availability of quality standards due to the variables of the study such as university, experience in supervision and reviewing , while there are differences to the variable of degree qualification  of Assistant Professor and Professor in favor of the professor.The study recommended the need to work on applying quality standards in the appointment of the supervisors of the theses in education and in the formation of panelsof discussion and reviewing.   Key words: quality, quality criteria, Graduate Studies, supervisor, discussion panels and reviewing. 
546 |a AR 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Special aspects of education 
690 |a LC8-6691 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n المجلة العربية لضمان جودة التعليم الجامعي, Vol 6 (2013) 
787 0 |n https://journals.ust.edu/index.php/AJQAHE/article/view/758 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2308-5347 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2308-5355 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ae274f2fb5cf4c608974c8dc6bf59a01  |z Connect to this object online.