Using floating catchment area (FCA) metrics to predict health care utilization patterns

Abstract Background Floating Catchment Area (FCA) metrics provide a comprehensive measure of potential spatial accessibility to health care services and are often used to identify geographic disparities in health care access. An unexplored aspect of FCA metrics is whether they can be useful in predi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul L. Delamater (Author), Ashton M. Shortridge (Author), Rachel C. Kilcoyne (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_aefdf9e8194d466bb33c6b9f7ed2c05f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Paul L. Delamater  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ashton M. Shortridge  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rachel C. Kilcoyne  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Using floating catchment area (FCA) metrics to predict health care utilization patterns 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12913-019-3969-5 
500 |a 1472-6963 
520 |a Abstract Background Floating Catchment Area (FCA) metrics provide a comprehensive measure of potential spatial accessibility to health care services and are often used to identify geographic disparities in health care access. An unexplored aspect of FCA metrics is whether they can be useful in predicting where people actually seek care. This research addresses this question by examining the utility of FCA metrics for predicting patient utilization patterns, the flows of patients from their residences to facilities. Methods Using more than one million inpatient hospital visits in Michigan, we calculated expected utilization patterns from Zip Codes to hospitals using four FCA metrics and two traditional metrics (simple distance and a Huff model) and compared them to observed utilization patterns. Because all of the accessibility metrics rely on the specification of a distance decay function and its associated parameters, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to evaluate their effects on prediction accuracy. Results We found that the Three Step FCA (3SFCA) and Modified Two Step FCA (M2SFCA) were the most effective metrics for predicting utilization patterns, correctly predicting the destination hospital for nearly 74% of hospital visits in Michigan. These two metrics were also the least sensitive to changes to the distance decay functions and parameter settings. Conclusions Overall, this research demonstrates that FCA metrics can provide reasonable predictions of patient utilization patterns and FCA utilization models could be considered as a substitute when utilization pattern data are unavailable. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Spatial accessibility 
690 |a Access to health care 
690 |a Health care use 
690 |a Utilization patterns 
690 |a Hospitalizations 
690 |a Floating catchment areas 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Health Services Research, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-3969-5 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/aefdf9e8194d466bb33c6b9f7ed2c05f  |z Connect to this object online.